It doesn't make much sense to me to criticize an LED flash for washing out a picture and hold up the Xenon flash as better. My point was that flashes in general, regardless of what kind they are, wash out pictures and make them look horrible. So I really don't care if it's LED or Xenon. Flashes make for bad pictures. It's silly that people make such a big deal out of this.
So again, I think that people who are knowledgable about real cameras know that megapixels and flashes are not the things that make for good quality images (and Rafe says as much in his video interview on All About Symbian). What matters are things like the lens, the actual physical size of the sensor, low light sensitivity of the sensor (which in many cameras obviates the need for a flash), focal length, the range of aperture settings, having a real shutter. So, again, the fact that the N86 has multiple aperture settings and a real mechanical shutter, makes it much more like a real camera, than having a Xenon flash.
It will be interesting to see how the N82 sizes up, when the two get compared side by side. I think the N86 has the potential to be a genuine step forward in phone-camera technology. Even if the N86 doesn't turn out that good, Nokia is taking a step in the right direction, by stopping focusing so much on the things like flashes and megapixels, that aren't so important.