I don't really think those are the "facts." The N82 may be the best camera phone in low light conditions, if you like photos taken with a flash and don't think they're ugly. Otherwise, in all other lighting conditions (which is most of the time for most people) Nokia has produced many N series phones that are comparable to the N82. So once again, the Xenon isn't everything and it doesn't make the N82 the "best" in any objective or generalizable sense. It's particularly good in one very specific situation, when using a flash, and that is only "better" than other camera phones if that reflects a certain set of personal (subjective) choices about what makes for a good photo.
I'm happy with camera phones in much the same way you are. So you're just making a straw man argument to dismiss our points. I just don't like flash, I don't care about flash (as well as ever more megapixels), and I would like to see cell phone manufacturers focus on other more important improvements (lenses, sensors--for the umpteenth time), which are perfectly realistic expectations from a cell phone. It will never be like a D60, or D3, or Mark III, but it can be a whole lot better than it is. But the manufacturers will never do this as long as they can get away with more irrelevant solutions (flashes, megapixels) that are cheaper and easier to do, since consumers don't know any better.