Also, why the heck do they keep on harping about Symbian being dated? Those stupid ****s have no clue. They mean the UI is similar to the S60 we've always had and that's big difference from saying that Symbian is outdated.
Symbian is the only mobile OS to support demand paging as far as I know and that is just one of the technical advantages it has over other OSes. The OS has been fine tuned and improved that years in a way that is perfect for mobile devices. I know Linux has more potential and all but see how difficult of a time even Google is having getting linux to run on a phone with all the needs of a phone OS?
Symbian has come to the point where the entire phone stack and the application stack can run one processor and do so reliably. This is one thing all S60 phones have had from day one, of course they needed dual processor before to that but not anymore. If an application crashes or stalls, you can always hit menu and go to the home screen and place a call. If an application crashes while on the phone, your phone call will not ever be affected. Sure, rarely the entire battery needs to be taken out but that is an issue of negligence (see N78) rather than a weakness of a the OS itself (see E-series).
It's pretty clear that Engadget is a place full of morons who really don't know anything. Symbian is the best OS that runs on a phone and it has a track record that nothing else on the planet has. ****ing morons on Engadget are clueless.
Now Nokia's selective implementation of the OS is another thing. Some phones have it to the point where it works with rock solid speed and stability and others have it implemented like the OS seems like a straight up turd.
Also having played with the 5800 prototype at the Nokia store I can say the screen needs more of a punch than a tap. I'm waiting on hearing 5800 user reports before deciding whether that's how they make the prototypes or if it is a genuine issue.