I think Blaxx expressed it best. We don't care if it's the fastest or middle of the pack as long as it does what we want it to do. You will have been proven right if Nokia experiences a 5800'esque quick recall due to replete Out of Memory errors or if the Facebook app brings the phone to it's knees needing continued reboots. If purchasers of N97 still get to enjoy Ngage games (maybe not the hardware optimized versions, but adaptations / new releases) and never see an out of memory error or experience any lockups, then you'll be proven 100% wrong.
Reality is somewhere in between... if I see one or two out of memory errors that are corrected with a software/firmware update at some point in the near future and I then to get the point you're proven wrong, you will have been right for a short time period that software optimization fixed and made you wrong about after that point.
In any case you're in the wrong thread, I think. It would be analogous to me going into the Omnia thread and every few pages repeatedly ranting about it's lack of QWERTY or insufficient storage and wondering why Samsung don't pull their head out and get with the bleeding edge on storage and what not.
That's not where Samsung wanted to go in the same way Nokia wasn't trying to push the hardware envelope with N97. Will Samsung go with QWERTY and bigger built in storage? Maybe. Should they? Regardless of the opinion on that, it doesn't belong in the Omnia thread more than once or twice.
Or many of us just aren't interested in gaming and Nokia would be wasting their efforts as much as they have with those not interested in social networking or the larger concept of interactive Internet wherever you go. If you weren't into music on your phone, I definitely wouldn't recommend a 5800 to you. If you weren't interested in QWERTY, I woudln't recommend an E71, much less an N97 since that's a major portion of it's appeal and focus. If you weren't interested in a good camera and touchscreen, neither N97 nor Omnia would be on the short list. Etc etc.