It is also worth noting (when I go back and look at it) that in the All About Symbian review, Rafe considered the N86 better than the N82 in almost all areas: better at low light photography without needing a flash; better ability to capture moving objects in low light conditions (probably due to the variable aperature settings); better color accuracy with the LED flash (although less overall illumination than the Xenon); better at landscape photography due to the 28mm lens; better ability to reproduce detail than the N82, in almost all circumstances, despite the problems with the processing algorithm; better color accuracy in general; less tendency to overexpose photographs.
It is particularly worth repeating that in almost all circumstances, the All About Symbian article found that the N86 reproduces detail better than the N82, despite the problems with the processing algorithm that the GSMAreana review notes. Also, as far as detail goes, the GSMArena review finds the N86 lags behind the Samsung i8510 INNOV8. It makes no comparisons to the N82.
So despite the software issues in the N86, it's a pretty big stretch to conclude that the N82 is better than the N86 (except in conditions where one would find the Xenon flash beneficial). All About Symbian found the N86 to be better than the N82. GSMArena does not compare the N86 to the N82. This hardly justifies the "long live the N82" conclusion.