You forgot to comment on the N82's lack of 3G.
You were the one that asked what more people could want from a phone.
If people dont care about the size of the screen, then why has every phone manufacturer increased the size of the screen in the past two years. Just look at Nokia alone, the difference between the N95 models can be distinguished by an increase in screen sizes. All of the new phones that have been announced in the past few days, have a screen larger than the N82.
The N86 will not be crowned the king of the phone world, it will have to compete from within with the N97, and from outside sources from Samsung, SE, and others.
I could understand Nokia's product line a few years ago, They had the N95=the flagship, do everything, at high speed, and have a wow factor when people see it. Some could see this as the replacement for the N80
Next was the N82=the imaging king, it could do much the same as the N95, just slower, but it was a basic candy bar form, no one said wow when they saw the N82 in your hand. This was a replacement for the N73
The E71=Business workhorse, meant to combat hackberry's and appeal to the business minded, not meant to take great pictures or handle media usage very well. This was the replacement for the E61 or possibly the E65
Where are we now, Where does the current/future Nokia offerings fall into this list?? When you look at the new phones, which one is the flagship??
Which on is the Imaging King??? Which one is the Business workhorse???? (Actually the E71 is still the frontrunner in this category)
If the N86 is the imaging king, then it had better have a xenon flash, it can not be the king, if it takes lesser quality pictures than its predecessor. For me the N86 looks like a slightly upgraded n95. Especially with the dual slider.
The N97 starts a class all its own, It could be taken as the next communicator, with the sliding keyboard.
This leaves one giant void. No replacement for the N82???????