What.cd and Waffles ban Azureus and Deluge

That is torrent files.. and in case I'm wrong and it's the actual files, then where would I move +1TB of files?

It's a fucking bad decision made by staff. They gave no good alternatives. They only have alternatives.

They only care about their torrents. How about they consider the vast amount of torrents from other sites, downloaded to other locations. It would take me hours upon hours to get everything seeding again in uTorrent or any other client. I work between 8 and 14 hours a day. No way am I going to spend my weekend serving their uTorrent God-complex.
 
anon is not telling the whole truth.
He is talking about extreme mod but go peak into his site and you'll see them crying about losing shu mod.
 
They certainly should have waited until uTorrent 2.0 was more universally accepted and proven before forcing people to make the switch. And they definitely should have waited for Transmission to get their acts together, though perhaps version 1.9 fixes some of the issues that have been plaguing the 1.8x series.
 
kukushka said:
there is actually. in utorrent. collect all .torrents in one folder.
- point the default downloading folder to your first hdd's seeding place
- copy all .torrents to a watch folder
- rehash them
- kill all non-rehashed .torrents
- restore them to another folder
- point dl folder to your second folder with your stuff
- copy all non yet rehashed torrents to watch folder again
etc etc
Click to expand...
Thanks for the suggestion m8 but I'm talking about 6 HDDs with sharing material all of them organized with the same structure something like
-scene
--movies
---xvid
---x264
---dvd
---bd
--music
---mp3
---flac
--apps
--games
--elearning
--tvseries
---a
----season 1
-----ep1
-----ep2
.
.
.
-nonscene
--movies
---xvid
---x264
---dvd
---bd
--music
---mp3
---flac
--apps
--games
--elearning
--tvseries
---a
----season 1
-----ep1
-----ep2
.
.
.
-temp
Click to expand...
I share the same things in DC so it has to be organized. A lot of the nonscene are also renamed in order to catalogue them to my media center. I'm not going to spent a week changing all these just because staff think that 2 GB of memory is something I can't afford
That was another bad joke :whistling
 
All you would have to do is set Utorrent's download directory to where vuze downloads to.

Then put the .torrent files you downloaded from the link into Utorrent, and it'll automatically start seeding them. You don't need to move anything.
 
ringhunter said:
His custom title tempts users to go exploring. :dry:
Click to expand...

The ironic thing is I didn't have any clue that there was a cheating forum associated with the initials sbi until polarbear , the very person so stridently denouncing anon, made me aware of it in another thread.
So maybe I should ban polarbear?:idunno:
 
anon-sbi said:
The torrent's info_hash must be the same for that to happen. It isn't the best method... most of the time the "cheaters" caught using that are people that like in your case, added multiple private tracker URLs to the same torrent (manually or otherwise), and got banned on one of them for reporting upload/download activity it otherwise wasn't tracking.
Click to expand...
you're looking from different angle, i'm speaking about non-intentional violations of stats reporting, just like those +15/20% in deluge. one more time - when automatically adding .torrents if the same hash is found, utorrent just quietly add the next announce string to the torrent without giving any notice to user and placing him in potentially dangerous situation. rtorrent as example just says to gtfo
 
dvdasacd said:
so occasionally opening a second client isn't too outrageous.
Click to expand...

It really isn't. Especially if a person only downloads an album or two here and there. And until it's actually been proven by others that Deluge reports to the tracker more than you have actually downloaded, then I'm going to stick with it. It's the client I'm happiest and most familiar with.
 
The way i see it, there's a lot of hypocrisy in here. (regarding the whole anon-sbi story)

I mean, it's not even a second chance. You all know anon is involved in cheating activities in one way or another at the moment. Besides, if you gave him a "second chance", why not give a "second chance" to all the other cheaters? It would be fair that way... right? :huh:

And no, nice and intelligent posts do not define someone. Actions do.
 
Rart said:
All you would have to do is set Utorrent's download directory to where vuze downloads to.

Then put the .torrent files you downloaded from the link into Utorrent, and it'll automatically start seeding them. You don't need to move anything.
Click to expand...

Ok I will spell it out for you. My files are all over the place. Music folders by date of download, music folders by music folder/Starting letter/artist/album, DVD folders, x264 folders, xvid folders, series folders, Hd folders, programs folders, documentary folders, ebook folders, upload folder etc. etc. spread out over three drives + laptop drive.

It would take ages.
 
lysine said:
I still haven't seen anyone come with any proof (real and reproduceable) that shows uTP enabled clients prefering one over the other. all of that hoopla started on bitmetv and they still haven't showed any proof of thier statements. as the news announcement on what.cd states:





I don't know but it would be best if this uTP thingamajig could be and is mandated to be turned off on private trackers - use it on demonoid!
Click to expand...

since it was first implemented, it's always been possible to disable it. in the advanced options of utorrent, set the bt.transp_disposition to 5. that completely disables all of the uTP stuff in the client.
Click to expand...

yea well i'm going on what has been said at various sites as are most ppl. And i think if the first statement is correct then like msot private trackers require DHT to be turned off, the same should be implemented for uTP IF it does behave in that manner. I use DHT when going public hunting and it would be the same for that new protocol.
 
The_Martinator said:
And I have to lol at the fact that you have a split internet personality; the anon at the cheating forum and the ultra moral one here. I guess everything is possible online.

And don't worry about making fun of me, I can take. Just ask your Idols, to them it's a habit. :lol:
Click to expand...

You seem to know really well how things are at his forum :whistling
How are the internet connections in slovenia?
 
ultrauploader said:
I mean, it's not even a second chance. You all know anon is involved in cheating activities in one way or another at the moment. Besides, if you gave him a "second chance", why not give a "second chance" to all the other cheaters? It would be fair that way... right? :huh:

And no, nice and intelligent posts do not define someone. Actions do.
Click to expand...

Who talked about a second chance here? It's not like FST is a tracker and I've been banned for cheating it in the past...
 
Back
Top