I've complained about credibility since I got here, and how people needing it made debate and discussion worse, and if any band seems to draw the "not that good" credibility, its Nirvana.
It must be from a diffrent time and place, maybe if you're surrounded by a million Nirvana fans, you'd grow to dislike them, but Nirvana and their peers are banRAB that were undoubtedly great, I just never hear people claim them for their favorite band.
Regardless of any of that, they are well reviewed for a reason. If someone comes here and says "you know, their really not my thing", I still won't understand why they came in here, but I'll at least respect their opinion.
When you show up with "Nirvana was overrated/****ty/underserving of praise/ect." to me that says you're looking for attention. Especially in this thread.
When a bunch of us started and Stu was driving Zep down our throats I probably said Zeppelin sucks alot, and yes I was lying, but that wasn't in the "Official Led Zeppelin" thread.
My point in all of this is that its a lame grab for attention, and that to slag a decent band is trite and getting old. I saw someone do it recently in some other thread and I figured rather than address it there, I'd bring it up here where I suppose its appropriate.