LOL.
As manufacturing costs for the N97 come down and it becomes more affordable for Nokia to make (and probably more affordable for the end consumer as well), Nokia will want to give the unit a reason for staying on the market and still being sold. It is for this reason that the N97-x+ or whatever won't have linearly improved hardware across the board to make the entire first iteration redundant. The N95-1 still sold as a EU 3G variant with a microSD card door, and it was your only option for that. The price for moving up to the 8GB N95-2 was (painfully) slow internal memory operation, lack of camera protection, and the removal of the hot-swappable microSD door for that beefed up RAM and battery and slightly larger screen. For many, these "features" could be deal-breakers and the N95-1, at a lower price point, still pushed many units despite the existence of its "superior" sister unit. Nokia hasn't yet made its older sister units entirely obsolete compared to the newer ones, ESPECIALLY not in the way of internal architecture (CPU and GPU; forget about camera!), and I don't expect them to do that with the N97 either.
And even then, don't expect N97+ (with minor improvements) for at least another 9 months or so. Take note of the small improvements made prior. RAM was the basis for the N95-2, the rest were arguably gimmicks. It was released considerably later. The E90 tweak barely fixed the keyboard imprinting the screen, if anything else.
I'm expecting that Cortex A8 in the N98, not in the N97. GPU is still a maybe, for the N98, not the N97. I expect the N97-whatever to bring improved RAM if the firmware updates couldn't do it to the N97-1, but little else (possibly even a few negatives coming along with it). I'm doubtful of the N97+ because the N95 line was still hardware-superior and profitable for that reason as the N95-2 was released. That won't be the case with the N97+.
Give my my N98, thank you.
Also, I find it funny you rabble-rousers are so disappointed with a product you don't even own.
