Obama targets private jets, Big Oil

.....and even right there you display your ignorance of using utility. It's OK, though. Utility is not something most people understand, so life goes on.


Or play armchair economist on economic utility topics while derpin' out. Ya know... whatever.
 
i'm not talking about taxation or fair taxation. i'm talking about fair. quit seeing worRAB that aren't there. do you have too much jizz in your eyes karen?
 
I don't see why no one is considering taxing the poor. Democrats blubber about rich people paying "their fair share", what about the roughly 48% of people who pay no federal income taxes. What is fair about the top 10% paying 60-70% while almost a majority pay nothing? Democracy fails when people realize they can vote themselves money.
 
Did anyone else read where Karen said we need to lighten the load on the bottom 60%? Bearing in mind that 83% of that group have no tax liability whatsoever. How do you lighten someone's load if they aren't carrying anything?
 
Well let's see. That bottom poor part not paying their taxes vs that upper rich class not paying their taxes. Which side hurts more?
 
protip: you apparently don't have enough of an understanding of economics to realize that you've done exactly that.





Let's see if we find your references to utility here Damn ... I missed it. Lemme re-read.
 
Tell me how giving a consideration to the amount of usefulness a person would assign to the money being collected by the government is a silly idea in discussions about how the government should collect money.

How maybe taking into consideration the fact that taking 30% of a tilesetter's income could put him in the gutter, while 30% of Steve Jobs's yearly income leaves him living just about as fabulously ...h ow considering this is "silly".


I'm all ears.
 
Back
Top