Obama targets private jets, Big Oil

There is no need to discuss marginal utility when I am discussing the abstract fairness of our tax code with regarRAB to whether or not there is a bias inherent in said tax code (with no discussion of whether that bias is a good thing or a bad thing). I'm sorry I don't feel the need to flex my intellectual muscles at you even though you so desperately want me to since it turns you on so much Karen.



So basically now you're just saying you don't even understand what marginal utility is. Cool.



no, pretty sure you're just stupid.
 
i'm not talking about corporate taxes. corporate taxes are a separate subject completely. i'm talking about income taxes. you say the rich aren't paying enough. the rich people pay more into the system than they strictly should by the nurabers, so i ask again: when will they be paying enough for you?

corporate taxes are an entirely different animal.
 
You said "fair" when you really only meant "proportional to their share of national income".


Those two are hardly the same, and I endeavored to point that out. Likely you knew that, but your post could do with some elaboration, and possible correction.
 
.... you're being a moron. Just, FYI.



Even if I said nothing about "making sure to avoid hitting them with tax increases", you yourself stated that some of the bottom 60% group pays taxes, durabass, making my suggestion to cut taxes for that group applicable.
 
give a trailer trash honky a $100K and see what they do with it. 60" Panny plasma fer my double wide to go with my $50K Super Duty pick 'em up truck!

UTILITY.
 
You're obv. crying about unfairness just because the top 1% have done better than the bottom fifth.

If your argument was based on that the top 1% have done better by using coercive force against the bottom fifth, then I'd agree with you in that it's wrong. But just because some people did better than others, that's not reason enough to make it wrong.
 
I'm not going to bother though because you're obviously too busy flicking your bean at the thought of me giving you attention Karen.
 
"There's no need for me to consider any factors as 'bias' other than simple-minded ones. It's safe for me to ignore more complex ones like utility and still claim to have given consideration to it."



Your logic is underwhelming, champ.
 
Back
Top