Nokia N95 or iPhone

In North America, cellular network is advancing at, well snails pace. So you cant really market 3/3.5G networks here when people dont bother with them at all, considering how expensive voice+data plans are here. And its 10times worse up here in Canada with Lord Rogers charging an arm and a leg for voice+data plans.
 
N95 if I had the money for either. it's a much more useful and flexible device. The only downside is that you might want to carry around a charger or an extra battery (Oh, did anyone mention you can't change the battery in the iPhone?).

iPhone is a useful device within a very limited framework, but beyond that framework (for example, if you want to add 3rd party apps) the iPhone is useless.

Basically, when you buy the iPhone, you're getting an iPhone. And all it will ever be is what you're holding in your hand (a music player, POP3 e-mail program, photo gallery, and web browser, basically...oh and a phone). For some, that's enough. For those who want to add on features and capabilities, the N95 is a better choice (Like, say, syncing with Exchange or Blackberry server, or installing an MS-Office compatible office package, or a Skype client).

Oh, and has anyone mentioned that there are external keyboards available for Symbian S60 devices?
 
I really don't know why people compare the iPhone to the N95. Completely different devices. The N95 is a very advanced multimedia convergence smartphone. The iPhone is a feature phone with a web browser and media player functionality. That is it.
The iPhone is severely lacking in features and power but not everyone needs the N95's features nor has any idea what to do with them.

If you just want to replace your iPod and phone with some web browsing with a (somewhat) different interface from what is around, get the iPhone. Power users need not apply.

If you need a swiss army knife that can do more than any other device on the market, the answer is simple. The N95 is for the early adopter that wants to have everything in pocket without having multiple devices. Minicam, GPS, portable 3d game console, 5 MP camera, business phone with TV out for Powerpoint presentations, music & video player etc.

Why is this so difficult for people to understand?
 
Actually, I'd rather have a device that does what I need it to do without a lot of "tweaking". If you'd rather tweak, then have at it. I had a Symbian device a few years ago, and the "neat" factor wore off fast. I used the built in features and nothing more.

Also, the Zeiss name on a lens doesn't mean that much any more. They are made in Asia, not Germany like the older Hasselblad lenses. I wouldn't put too much stock in a "name brand" vs. "no name" argument...
 
I do understand that US is advancing real slow in cellular technology and this really saddens me... but yeah Lord Rogers are still worse than US warlords lol
 
You know, I am shocked that no one has addressed the profiles issue with the iPhone. I love the ability to setup different profiles on Symbian and even Series 40 phones so that I can change to one of multiple user defined presets with a few button presses how the phone notifies me for every communication feature (or even automatically depending on calendar events, time and physical location if you use something like Smartprofiles ).
 
Cant disagree with npaladin2000, Symbian OS is much more flexible and like I said before, N95 is a 'REAL" GPS phone with realtime directions.
 
You're right about the features.
However, there is one thing they are very similar... the price. That's the reason of the whole argument. With that much of money, which one people will choose and why.

(for me, with that money, I will get a PS3 )
 
The reason I wrote that Top 10 list is because an abnormally high number of iPhone bashers from day 1 seem be either Nokia N95 owners or just people who consider the N95 the ultimate "smart" phone. I don't share that opinion, obviously, but I'm always amazed that the weaknesses or trade-offs with the N95 are often brushed aside or excused in these comparisons. I will elaborate on the list I made, responding to some of the comments that followed.
10. No, the N95 is not a large phone, but it is much thicker than the iPhone, and this is a disadvantage to the many cell phone users who carry their phones around in their front pockets. Form and function go hand-in-hand, and Apple's engineers obviously put a lot of effort into keeping the iPhone very slim and portable, not to mention attractive. I didn't even bring up the problematic sliders on the N95.
9. The battery life, or lack thereof, is a serious liability on the N95. If you want to talk on the phone for a couple of hours, surf the web for an hour and answer your email, you'd better take along a charger or an extra battery. Forget about listening to music and taking pictures. Most people recharge their phones at night, so if a phone can last the day after heavy usage -- like the iPhone -- that's really all most people need. The N95 doesn't reach the finish line.
8. The N95 IS the best camera ever on a cell phone, and better than the camera on the iPhone. What I question is the value, and trade-offs, inherent in sticking this kind of camera on a cell phone. The camera blurs the lines between poor cell phone cameras -- good only for sending pics to friends and family to display on a screen -- and consumer digital cameras good for printouts. It blurs the line, but it doesn't cross the threshold. The N95 is still a poor camera when compared to the lowest end digital cameras. These cameras are small, have some ability to zoom, have a far superior flash and much faster response times, better focusing, control and ergonomics. And they take better pictures -- no question about it.
7. The last criticism also applies to the video camera. It is impressive, no doubt, and better than nothing -- which is what the iPhone has. But the video on the N95 is no competition for even a low end video camera. It's not just the resolution, which is fine. It is the slow write speed, the heavy compression and the awkwardness of shooting video on this phone. My Canon S3 takes much much better photos AND video than the N95. But so does my 3-year-old Elph.
6. The S60 system on the N95 does lag at times. The iPhone feels pretty snappy in comparison. This advantage will not show up on any comparison chart, but it makes a difference in the user experience.
5. The N95 is seriously underpowered in the built-in memory department, and that is not a problem solved with micro SD cards, no matter what the size. When you load up a few half-complex web pages on the N95, it runs out of memory and needs to be restarted, which sucks no matter how your slice it.
4. GPS is great to have...in a car. It's nice to have in a cell phone, too, but navigating while driving using the N95 could be hazardous to your health. The smallish screen doesn't help, nor does paying $10 a month for turn-by-turn instructions. GPS integrated seamlessly with Google Maps on a decent sized screen would be nice, though. This could happen -- on the next iPhone.
3. The complete lack of QWERTY on a "smart" phone that is supposed to have robust web and email capability is simply unacceptable for many people. Yes, I know, your "friend" is the Lebron James of T9 typing. And you carry around a bluetooth keyboard. Sorry, but no thanks.
2. This is one of the more bizarre boasts I hear from N95 owners in the U.S. They have 3G -- that is completely unusable in the United States. What a waste. It's like driving a 4-wheel drive car, that only uses 2 wheels, but still feeling good about the blocked ability to use 4 wheels. GSM 3G is not ready for prime time in the U.S. It will be next year, but a feature unused is not a feature at all.
1. This is the most laughable argument I've heard comparing the N95 to the iPhone. These devices might share some underlying code, but the actual web surfing experience is like night and day. The multi-touch, the ability to quickly zoom in and out, and the accelerometer all make web browsing on the iPhone far superior.
 
All I use on my e815 is "Loud" or "Vibrate". It was the same when I used Nokia. I either had it with the sounds on or I had it set to vibrate.

Maybe most people do the same, and that's why it hasn't really been addressed. Once again, I don't care for all the "tweaking", but I can see where people may want or even need more options.

Bottom line, I don't think a person can go wrong with either the N95 or the iPhone. It boils down to what you like in a phone and what you need it to do.
 
I need different settings for when I am at work (vibrate, low volume, discreet message notification), when I am at work in meetings (basically vibrate only) and when I am at home (full blast to be audible over music or TV )
 
I have yet to see what your going to use the phone for. I had the option of getting the n95. I chose the iPhone. My reasons are:

I went into the store and played with it. kthnxbye.


That's all you need to do is stop by an APPLE store, if you like it, pick it. It will get better w/ apps and such, trust me... :-)
 
I think again this is all a matter of your opinions not based on fact, i dont have the iphone so i cant completely say yay or nay on it.From what i hear the iphone battery isnt that great.http://www.howardforums.com/showthread.php?t=1195014&highlight=battery+life
Lets talk about the great web browsing u talk about.
http://www.howardforums.com/showthread.php?t=1194292&highlight=safari
http://www.howardforums.com/showthread.php?t=1198251
//www.howardforums.com/showthread.php?t=1197314&highlight=web+browsing

What i find funny is you mention theses things knocking the n95 yet the apple forum is full of complaints and returns, and just look at user reviews between the 2 phones, the n95 by far has the better rating. The n95 isnt perfect by no stretch, but yes its better than the iphone, and lets talk about the most important things about a phone, call quality and reception tell me where they rank n95 vs iphone, The case is closed now.
 
Back
Top