Blazer, that post strikes me as very misleading. Would you mind terribly responding to these point-by-point?Does T-Mobile have any current Series 60 phones in their line-up (on their website)? (Answer:NO. Three Series 40 and lower phones.)Does Sprint PCS have any Nokia Series 60 Phones? (Answer: NO. Wrong technology of course. No Nokia phones at all!)Does Verizon have any Nokia Series 60 phones on their CDMA plans? (Answer: NO. Nokia failed in last year's attempt to enter the CDMA market. They only have the older 6215 made by Pantech.)Does Alltel have any Series 60 phones, or indeed coverage, in the major U.S. metro areas? Answer: NO. They only have the 2865i, an older low-end phone.Does that make Cingular the only U.S. carrier with a Series 60 Nokia phone (in the E62)? (Answer: Yes)Is Cingular tied for most Nokia phones including below Series 60 on U.S. Carriers? (Answer: Yes, 3 each for Cingular and T-Mobile)So by what metric are you declaring that only Cingular has Nokia/Series 60 problems? Nobody else even attempts it!
None of that proves the problem is with Nokia rather than Cingular. The reason I believe Nokia is at fault is that Cingular doesn't have these troubles with LG, Samsung, etc., because the testers I heard from in December didn't mention any branding but instead indicated the phone simply locked up randomly which indicates to me a stability problem rather than an added-software issue, and because if Series 60 and the phone were half as good as Nokia claims, Cingular adding their "Mall" links couldn't possible hose it.