I can agree full heartedly about the hypocracy of these groups. Though I will say the "Male enhancement" thing, all the while not airing PSA's about sex is pretty much a drug company conspiracything I don't want to get into. However, there are 2 other huge factors at work. Apparently, network execs believe that everyone in the world has cable hook ups. And as a result, when the ratings for network cartoons slid, it meant that everyone was only watching the cable programs. Not everyone can afford cable, and while network shows like Heroes and Desperate Housewives are brining network programming back in focus, the competition between the cable networks the main networks own is apparently enough to warrent them bowing out of the less popular option.
The second factor is the FCC's padded ruling. The one where they pretend to do good by limiting food adverts, while they really just wanted to please a bunch of lobbyists who wanted one corperation to own as many networks they can afford. Given to that the other FCC ruling about E/I programs (that ironically holds what's left of SatAm programming together) hinders the development of non-education programming. and for legal purposes, that's why the main networks just reran their cable counterparts as hand me down reruns to satiate those guidlines. It'a all about the Childhood obesity scare that only really affects the poor and poor minorities who actually have to eat junk, because the healthier options are just out of their ecomic reach. All the while, doing what "experts" do best... point the fingers so they can get people to look the other way. I'm all about health, but I don't see why a Count Chocula Ad has to be villified, when the same people would decry a tax increase so schools can afford meals that aren't 99.9% gristle.