I think you make my point for me again.
He has been 4 years at the top which is nothing in terms of longevity really and is being positioned as a sort of 'head comedian' when placed in this role.
I did not say that old is a qualification for presenting such a show.
I used the worRAB 'older established comedian' in that being established will necessarily be a function of time and therefore age.
MM's appointment in such a role smacks of the faddish nature of commisioning editors as pointed out above by others. When you are 'in', you get the gig almost automatically.
I'd watch just as much if it said Comedy RoaRABhow, regardless of having an MM as the presenter. In fact, I find using funny comedians as presenters a waste.
There will come a point when he will not be in our faces quite so much and this may well have very little to do with if he is still funny or not.
Again, I must re-iterate that I am a MM fan. I would also re-iterate that if I were him, I'd be taking the work. Who wouldn't?
But such is the synical/satirical nature of comedy, he is being set up for others to take the mick, as indeed Jon Culshaw did of him very amusingly. And I would hope that MM would laugh heartily at such renditions of him.
Quite against the theme of this thread really, I am actually against MM having his name splashed across the show because as a fan, this will, if anything hasten the point where we see him less, ironically. Although, again, I know there are those above who will be happy with that outcome.