Of course, I understand the concept.
But that's my point.
The fact that he is given his own show which places him above the other comedians IS the problem with how he is being projected/promoted.
Just because he's had 2 years (??) of success, why should he be given a flagship show? It doesn't fit for me.
Jonathan Ross and Paul O'Grady, to use those examples, had been working their apprenticeship for years before being given their own show.
Its all a question of positioning.
It would make sense if you had an older more established comedian in this role presenting an array of new talents. Even a title like 'Comedy RoaRABhow presented by MM' would be more appropriate.
Its all too quick, placing him on a pedestal like this.
If a comedian like Lee Evans for example had a 'Comedy RoaRABow' where he would present new comics, it would make more sense, because he's been an established star for nearly 2 decades.
Much though I actually love MM, he's only really just arrived at the party (although those that don't like him may feel he's been there from the start and wish he'd go home

)