seangriffen
New member
kuato, not to bombard you, but a thought came to me after my last reply on this topic
we know that there is no evidence in reality that anything in the bible is true, save for some mentioned historic places and names. we also know that a substantial part of the bible (way more than 50%) goes AGAINST physical evidence and reality. therefore, the majority of the bible is either contrary to reality or unconfirmable by reality
in cases where there is no evidence to support what the bible says, or where reality is contrary to what the bible says, faith is necessary to acceppt what the bible says as true. if we have no evidence that something is true, but yet believe that it is true, then that is using faith
so, what exactly is the difference between employing faith and lying to yourself?
we know that there is no evidence in reality that anything in the bible is true, save for some mentioned historic places and names. we also know that a substantial part of the bible (way more than 50%) goes AGAINST physical evidence and reality. therefore, the majority of the bible is either contrary to reality or unconfirmable by reality
in cases where there is no evidence to support what the bible says, or where reality is contrary to what the bible says, faith is necessary to acceppt what the bible says as true. if we have no evidence that something is true, but yet believe that it is true, then that is using faith
so, what exactly is the difference between employing faith and lying to yourself?