DIACers whose beliefs are largely in line with that of neoconservatives

  • Thread starter Thread starter Walter Sobchak
  • Start date Start date
Considering I was "never asked" when I posted the quote, you're a fucking liar. But what do you expect from a Moderate Republican?

Fuck off bitch, that cunt isn't someone I'd vote for. You're the self proclaimed Moderate Republican, you go jerk off to her.
 
No

Unemployment is not welfare, it is insurance. I support it but it probably could be done better by a private organization. I do support ending federal support for everything else listed.
 
The closest member I can think of on this board to actual neoconservatism is king. He's not an actual neocon, but he's the typical modern Buckleyite-Reagan conservative that has been substantially influenced by the neocon doctrine, regardless if he recognizes it or not.
 
Inane comments like this are the reason you're considered the right wing version of EC. Same level of intellect, same level of trolling.
 
is it really trolling when his level of intellect leads him to believe fervently in everything he posts?
 
I agree ... except public education. That should continue, at a BASIC level, for K-12, but the control should be at the State level. All the "Department of Education" should be is about 20 people who figure out, based on Census Data, how much money goes to the individual States.
 
Me a neocon?



That is just further evidence that seventh circle is totally fucking clueless.
 
Thankfully for you, you never have to both hearing me respond from you again. Welcome to the IL you stupid fucking Moderate Republican asshole.
 
Wirelessly posted via wap.offtopic.com (Opera/9.80 (Windows Mobile; WCE; Opera Mobi/WMD-50369; U; en) Presto/2.4.13 Version/10.00)



So you support Iraq but oppose exporting democracy through force? Can you explain how you reconcile this?
 
I didn't support the war in Iraq only because we were going to export democracy, I believed it then and now to be in our best national security interests.
 
Christ it's funny as hell watching idiots calling people "neo-cons" when they don't have a fucking clue what it means.
 
Can you explain how so? Because even now, finally, many National Review type conservatives are stating that Iraq wasn't vita to our national interest but instead was an "Exporting Democracy" type of a vision.
 
I believe that Saddam directly and indirectly was assisting those who were attacking our country and that we are safer with him out of office than in. That does not mean that would should dispose every leader we disagree with. I always believed in the 'honey pot' theory and we have seen it validated over and over again.

Do I think 'exporting democracy' will work in Iraq, I think the jury is still out. We won't be able to answer that question for the next 3-5 years.
 
Back
Top