I thought you'd finished debating but obviously you want to play it as obtuse as possible in defence of your hero.
The point on the van, my little apologist, is that we are led to believe that Matt didn't have a clue what was happening to him and that these were events building up to the final sequence.
However its very hard to accept that the party and its aftermath, getting rid of a stolen van, could have been done without the help of the production team --- so is Matt then so thick that he can go through a shop raid, a burglary and a street party with stolen gooRAB and yet there are NO repercussions. Did he not wonder what happened after the raid ? Did he not wonder where the van went--did he not try and return it ?. Its these incredible gaps that make a lie of the whole programme. But you get that...you're just a die hard fanatic whose determined to go down fighting for a programme he didn't even like.
Derren not doing his usual disclaimer isn't good enough for me. The programme should have been tagged up front as to what it was purportedly showing. Instead the aRAB, the fringe articles, everything about it looked like any other Event show --but obviously now we are being told it wasn't like any other Event show.
Sorry just not good enough for me.