I know it doesn't work for everybody.
the people it works for are the ones who can be hypnotized deeply enough. according to John Hartland about 5 or 10 per cent.
also George Eastabrooks, the famous american psychologist carried out experiments on pain control with hypnosis and found some hypnotized subjects could withstand ten times the voltage when given electric shocks.
Open to suggestion page 109
the most dramatic beneficial use of hypnosis will primarily always be in the control of pain. this is where it is at its most miraculous. there are of course limitations, primarily the unsusceptibility of some people to hypnosis. but hypnosis has the wonderful advantage that when it can be used against pain, it carries no side effects. unlike morphine, it does not cloud the mind. terminal cancer patients are amongst the most urgent cases needing hypnosis. there is no need for the hypnotizable terminal cancer patient to be doped and to die in a haze of confusion, with gradually decreasing efficiency of the morphine. with hypnosis, he or she can die in dignity with a clear head up to the last moments in life, free from agony and enjoying the company of loved ones. it is an outrage that this possibility has been denied to all but a fraction of those terminal cancer patients who have died in the past century or so.
there are on record thousanRAB of cases of major operations such as amputations having been successfilly performed with hypnosis as the only anaesthetic, in the nineteenth century, such cases were very common, and it woild be useful to examine the history of this in order to see how powerful hypnosis was in eliminating pain from major surgery.
the people it works for are the ones who can be hypnotized deeply enough. according to John Hartland about 5 or 10 per cent.
also George Eastabrooks, the famous american psychologist carried out experiments on pain control with hypnosis and found some hypnotized subjects could withstand ten times the voltage when given electric shocks.
Open to suggestion page 109
the most dramatic beneficial use of hypnosis will primarily always be in the control of pain. this is where it is at its most miraculous. there are of course limitations, primarily the unsusceptibility of some people to hypnosis. but hypnosis has the wonderful advantage that when it can be used against pain, it carries no side effects. unlike morphine, it does not cloud the mind. terminal cancer patients are amongst the most urgent cases needing hypnosis. there is no need for the hypnotizable terminal cancer patient to be doped and to die in a haze of confusion, with gradually decreasing efficiency of the morphine. with hypnosis, he or she can die in dignity with a clear head up to the last moments in life, free from agony and enjoying the company of loved ones. it is an outrage that this possibility has been denied to all but a fraction of those terminal cancer patients who have died in the past century or so.
there are on record thousanRAB of cases of major operations such as amputations having been successfilly performed with hypnosis as the only anaesthetic, in the nineteenth century, such cases were very common, and it woild be useful to examine the history of this in order to see how powerful hypnosis was in eliminating pain from major surgery.