Black man defends home, self, son from lynch mob and gets PRISON for it

  • Thread starter Thread starter uneek
  • Start date Start date
really?? Ever heard of Bernard Goetz??

At the 14th Street station, Goetz entered the car through the rearmost door, crossed the aisle and took a seat on the long bench across from the door. Canty was across the aisle from him, lying on the long bench just to the right of the door. Allen was seated to Canty's left, on the short seat on the other side of the door. Ramseur and Cabey were seated across from the door and to Goetz's right, on the short seat by the conductor's cab.[8][7] According to Goetz's statement to the police, approximately ten seconds later Canty asked him, "How are you?" Goetz responded, "Fine". According to Goetz, the four men gave signals to each other, and shortly thereafter Canty and Barry Allen rose from their seats and moved over to the left of Goetz, blocking Goetz off from the other passengers in the car. Canty then said to Goetz, "Give me five dollars". Canty testified at the criminal trial that he was panhandling, although eyewitness testimony generally agreed that the four men were aggressive and threatening. Goetz told police that he thought from the smile on Canty's face that they wanted to "play with me", and he decided on a "pattern of fire" that he would use to shoot them. Goetz, pretending not to hear, asked Canty, "What did you say?" Canty repeated, "Give me five dollars".

After the second solicitation for money, Goetz stood up, and from beneath his blue windbreaker drew a .38 Special five-shot Smith & Wesson revolver. Goetz, who had prior firearms and target shooting experience, fired five shots, striking each of the four men.

Goetz was tried before a mainly white Manhattan jury,[13] six of whom had been victims of street crime.[41] He was acquitted of the attempted murder and first-degree assault charges and convicted of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree
 
No I'm not.

Here, let me spell it out to you. He was free to go outside and even to confront them. He is free to even get them to "back off his property".

What he ISN'T free to do is go out, back them off his property, AND THEN SHOOT THEM IN THE STREET IN THE STREET.




Sorry Joe, I'm not the fucking idiot here is looking stupid. You are the one, for saying that you have the right to leave your house, confront unarmed people, drive them from your property, THEN SHOOT THEM IN THE HEAD IN THE STREET.

If the prick had been on his property, waved a gun around, and they refused to leave his property, THEN I'd say "shoot the muther fuckers" ... but that ISN'T what happened now is it?


So go fuck yourself you jackass.
 
Sorry I've been absent from my own thread. It was the end of the work day, and I had some strawberries to help plant...


The kids did more than just yell. It's not like some random kids came to the street in front of his house, yelled, and got shot at.

They chased the son to his home, promising in an unkind way that they were going to inflict bodily harm.

Those are two very different scenarios. Would I have taken my son inside and callled the police? Yes. Would I have gone out to confront the hoods? Yes, but only if it meant getting my son inside to safety. Once inside I would call the police, and have my gun ready to initiate lead injection until the authorities arrived.

He handled the situation badly, to be sure, but when it's five on one (or even 5 vs 2 once dad was involved) I don't give a shit if they don't have guns. It's obviously not a fair fight, and I don't think anyone on here would abandon their self defense capability on some high moral ground so 5 hoods could stomp you and your son in the face until you're dead.
 
An excellent rebuttal as always. You have convinced me of the truth of your position.
 
That may be the case but I've seen a lot of these threads and all I am saying is that I have never heard any pro gun people call someone trigger happy for protecting themselves.
 
he was safe. if not vengeance, why did he leave his house and shoot someone who was only yelling racial slurs at him and his son?
 
It was just punk teenagers, probably a fight over some skank. If the kids had guns and were threatening them, well sure, blast away.

Do you remember high school when kids just used to have a fist fight, then everything went back to normal? Now some kid loses his dad for 4 years, and another kid is dead, all over some stupid shit that these kids probably would have laughed over a few years later.

I don't have a point, just rambling.
 
they are supposed to enforce laws. a "mob" of four teenagers yelling on your prized property is a violation of the law
 
The guy was wrong, brought it on himself. Had the kids tried to enter the house by force; whole new ballgame. But, they didn't.
 
Back
Top