where did you get this information?
i'm surprised to hear they're going to charge people extra for a channel that's basically the equivalent of CNN. what about the recent $3 price increase? shouldn't that cover the cost?
dirtyjeffer: BEV may have more channels, most of which are nothing but useless filler channels to look competitive for the big ads in the paper - "400 channels, the largest digital lineup in canada, 2/3 of which pure crap". in terms of adding useful channels like fox news and MSNBC, as well as discovery wings/military channel, bloomberg, MTV2, all of them are available on starchoice, TMN on demand, all of these channels and services are absent on BEV.
you're probably right, i don't believe there's a conspiracy not to add new american channels that directly compete with channels owned by globemedia. however, earlier this month the CRTC approved a request by CTV newsnet to change its formatting so that it could compete with channels like fox news. could this have been the reason for the delay of not adding fox news? either way, capacity or no capacity, as a customer i don't really give a ****. if bell want my business they need to play catch up to the rest and very quick. after all, the customers are the ones who decide if BEV stay in business or not.