C
Cat Whisperer
Guest
Heavy pot use does indeed impair cognitive functions long-term - I give you Dio as the evidence. 

No it doesn't. I never denied having said those things.Post 77 gives a couple of examples.
Continuing the hijack - while waiting for Cartooniverse to come and clear things up - and adding to Ioniser's post, I know a Sunday League football team that consists entirely of stoners and manages to be competitive. I know a guy who spent 6 years getting a Bsc in Infectious Diseases, or some such thing, while smoking pot on a habitual basis.
IOW, lay off us... I mean, them potheads. They are far less harmful to society than pissheads.
Oh, now THAT'S an objective source!![]()
Logic, reason, and the facts are clearly lost on you at this point, so my only reasonable response is VRAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAUGH.
I believe you mean "Dio is a fucking retard." Almost everybody in this thread, including a bunch of people who have smoked pot, are pointing out that he's an idiot.
That's like saying if I hold up a bank, then come back an hour later and hand all the money back, saying, "Just kidding!" they can't prosecute me.
I personally wouldn'ty care, no, but that's not even analogous since the doctor gets paid to examine people. This guy at the workshop was a paying customer himself, not an employee.So if you visit your family doc to get evaluated for a medical problem, you wouldn't care if he was stoned on pot?
I used to give guitar lessons. It was no skin off my nose if my students showed up high.
That was a joke. So was the reference to Otto the bus driver. I'm not a drooling moron.You are the evidence. We get that.Anecodtes are not evidence.
Drunk is not the same as baked. The comparison is not valid. I was stoned in 90% of my college classes and got straight A's.
Anecodtes are not evidence.The actual empirical data shows that driving stoned does not increase tthe risk for accidents. There's no way out of that box. That's a checkmate for me.
That's like saying if I hold up a bank, then come back an hour later and hand all the money back, saying, "Just kidding!" they can't prosecute me.
No, it's more like putting a pack of ribeyes in my purse at the grocery store, only to remove them before I check out. You can draw conclusions about my motives, but you can't arrest me because I ultimately never committed a crime. That's why guards don't detain people for shoplifting until they've reached the parking lot.
Hah - I was just going to post, "Can we not turn this thread into another episode of The Diogenes Show?"Who cares? If you want to make a point about marijuana not impairing cognitive abilities, then go find a cite. (Hint: One exists.) This bullshit "no it doesn't" "I'm a pothead so I know what I'm talking about" "no it doesn't" "you're wrong" crap is what turns your threads into the Dio Show. Either back up your opinion with facts, or STFU. On a message board supposedly dedicating to fighting ignorance, coming in to a thread and making an argument consisting of, "I'm right you're wrong, I just am and you have to accept it, I'm right right right and you're wrong wrong wrong" is pretty sad.