If we went on a single payer health care system and the government was picking up the tab, would you use it more than you are now?
My point of this question is if we get our heath care taken care of, it would create a system of "recreational health care" in which people will take their kids in for every sniffle because it's free and they get free antibiotics. This clogs the system and stops people who really need health care from getting it.
So would you, or rather do you think the majority of the nation, use the free health care to it's full extent or would the country actually restrain itself and only use it in the most absolutely necessary instances?
Fred: Why would I need a lobotomy? It is a logical question, I don't trust the people of the US to not overuse free health care, do you? There's no need for hate
My point of this question is if we get our heath care taken care of, it would create a system of "recreational health care" in which people will take their kids in for every sniffle because it's free and they get free antibiotics. This clogs the system and stops people who really need health care from getting it.
So would you, or rather do you think the majority of the nation, use the free health care to it's full extent or would the country actually restrain itself and only use it in the most absolutely necessary instances?
Fred: Why would I need a lobotomy? It is a logical question, I don't trust the people of the US to not overuse free health care, do you? There's no need for hate