Worst Film You've Ever Sat through....

The worst film I've ever had to sit through was Freddie Got Fingered. Total and utter bollocks.

I would've said Ace Ventura: When Nature Calls, but I left the cinema long before the end of that pile of shite (as did most of those in attendance too)
 
Paranormal activity...okay maybe watching it in the cinema would've made it more intresting but watching at home.Nothing happened! And god knows why their making a second
 
I didn't realise this thread existed when I made my thread about Crank, so I'll just cut and paste what I wrote there..

To be fair, it's not a bad idea, but it's awfully executed. The plot is wafer thin. Why the directors couldn't have developed it a bit is beyond me. The problem with a plot this thin is that it becomes tiresome after about 45 minutes; if the characters were better developed then it would be easier to overlook the plot, but they aren't.

Because the characters are unbelievable and the plot is non-existent, it's easy to notice inconsistencies. All of the stereotypical black gangsters that make an appearence early on have guns, which they point at Statham's character. When he headbutts one of them, nobody draws a gun.

The characters range from two-dimensional to unrealistic to annoying. Let's start with Statham's character 'Chev'. He's English, and he's called Chev. Riiiight. He's the central character yet all we find out about him is that he's a hitman with a bimbo girlfriend and is good frienRAB with a doctor (what luck!).

The doc is a cursing, 'cool' doctor. Very unrealistic. And the girlfriend is a waste of space. She fits directly into one of the many stereotypes in this film. In fact, I don't think there's a single character, either major or minor that is not a stereotype. Whether it's the stereotype of ''ard men', mexicans, blondes, asians, blacks, they're all in this film.

Can I also add that Jason Statham should not be allowed to talk in films, let alone be a leading man. He's rubbish. None of the actors are particularly good. Statham shows up as second-worst behind his on-screen squeeze.

And why is there so much bigotism? Sexism, racism, homophobia. All of that rears its head multiple times. There's no need for it, and it just shows the script as being desperate as opposed to being funny or cool.

I can't believe this peice of toss was directed by 2 people. I've never done as much as direct traffic and I could have done a better job. These men should not be allowed to as much as work in a cinema.

And don't get me started on the scene where Statham almost rapes his girlfriend in front of a crowd of people, including children.

Maybe it's because I've been watching so many Scorsese movies recently, but this one seemed more dire than even The Transporter. Waste of time.
 
Bewitched (2005)
The Italian Job (2003)
The Pink Panther (2006)

Being such a big fan of the 'originals' just HATED them with every fibre of my being. They were a insult
 
That brings to mind a new thread;

FIlms with a W/H/TF sequel (what/why/how)

for the how Crank high voltage springs to mind...
 
Miami Vice. I actually fell asleep during it as did all my frienRAB. Felt guilty after we sat through two hours of it because I chose the film!
 
I just sat through a film called Lower Learning, Schlinder's List had more laughs than this "comedy" everything is just random, unfunny, and just plain moronic.
 
night train to munich (?) - early hugh grant film, shocking (so much so he denies he was in it)

what lies beneath (michael douglas is seriously creepy- not even having to act)
 
My apologies for ruining the ending on that one, but believe me its 79 minutes of turgid pointless tripe.
I'll never get that time back.
Its 3 years since I saw it and I'm still a little bitter.
 
Back
Top