No, I didn't, and healthy, respectful debate is a good thing, so don't worry.
UnsilentMajority - I have looked up the definition of 'exploitive' and there's no question the film falls into all four of its primary definitions. I think you might be interpreting my words, which isn't surprising considering the frequent mis-use of the term (I'm sure you didn't mean to - you know I respect and like you tremendously).
I simply meant that people will be profitting off the events of that day, and I doubt it's the families of the victims.
I could be wrong about that, but I doubt it, and that's exploitive. It's not
strictly unethical, but it's in exceptionally bad taste.
Now, if the profits were to go to the survivors and victims' families, I'd still have trouble with the film, but I'd feel a lot less put-off by it all.
Finally, I still find it sad and disturbing that documentary footage of the day isn't enough to let Jane and Joe Average (if indeed they're the ones who need to see this film, as
Childhood Magic claims - but which I disagree with) understand how horrible those events were. I know many,
MANY people fall into this category, and again - I'm not one of them, and I'm glad I'm not one of them.
I don't think movies have to strictly be entertaining - of course not - but I think there are other ways of approaching the topic. And
UnsilentMajority - I do agree that telling a specific story is in better taste than making things up - as with
Pearl Harbor and
Titanic - but that's not enough for me to be okay with this movie.
*shrug* I respectfully disagree.