Wii graphics look better than Xbox1? I think not! v.PICS ***56K DIE***

How are we being ripped off by Nintendo? I paid $250 for a console that, even with the limited games so far, is more fun all the games I have ever played on my modded XBox.

I was thinking I would never buy another console again. My Godson has a 360 and brings it over all the time. The games are pretty but there is nothing special in any of them. Not that it's not fun, but I have as much or more fun with games on my PC. It's the same old thing that was on PS1/XBox/GC/360/PS2/PS3. Just enhanced a bit with more details.

After watching my son play the Wii at a friends house and me trying it out at a store, I was hooked. It's different. It got me excited about console gaming again.

Just because it doesn't have the horsepower of the 360/PS3, don't think that it won't have a long life. And once developers see that it is sitting in 4X as many homes as PS3's they will be killing themselves to make games for it.
 
Thanks for clearly illustrating your ignorance.
IF YOU COMPARE SPECS, yes, the Wii cpu is at least 2x the power of the celeron in the xbox. (the powerPC chip is 2x the power at the same clock speed as the pentium/celeron).
Nothing looks any better than the gamecube, because all the current Wii games were devloped on basically gamecube hardware modified to use the Wiimote.

The xbox360 doesnt do ANYTHING better than the wii so far, other than graphics. The endless FPS shit on 360 is boring as hell.
If you dont want to spend money on subpar games, the Wii is the best choice.
 
I disagree with 10 times more fun. It's different and works well with certain types of games...for Zelda, I didn't get any more of the experience playing with teh Wiimote with the one exception that pointing at the screen for the Bow/slingshit/boomerang was easier...the swinging thing got old.

And the remote can't replace analog sticks yet...heck, you use an analog stick to move in Zelda...I don't see how the wiimote could be used to control in a game like that. Certain types of games...it's great...for traditional based stuff...it's just an afterthought.

This has nothing to do with the design of the game itself...Zelda is terrific. But it isn't a leap over the GC version.
 
Oh, I'm sure the Bouncer pic is cutscene but not pre-rendered movie CGI as you posted with FFXII. The Bouncer's pre-rendered movies were so much more prettier. SQE hasn't improved too much on the movie CGI. But graphically, in game that is, everyone has improved substantially... well, save KOEI. All the Dynasty Warriors look the same, which tells you stories into how they're all about graphics and shiny things.
 
You are right.
Gameplay is where its at. But I love how all the nintendo fanboys use this stupid excuse, as if xbox or ps3 or any other non nintendo console didnt have games with good gameplay.
 
As a VERY proud xbox 1, xbox 360, ps2 owner the only system that i am truely looking forward to in terms of next gen is the wii. I loved my n64 and was a nintendo fanboy by all means when i browsed n64.com all day back in the heyday. I haven't even played a wii but it is honestly the most promising and only 250 dollars? I don't give a fuck about graphics, yes they are nice but they are a novelty ever since the ps2 came out with mgs2. They look good but when it comes down its all about how the game will play. Support w/e system you want but just as nintendo brought out the analog mini joystic for the 64 they brought out the wiimote to once again up the generation of video gaming. Shooters aside nothing will prove a match for the wii's fun factor and its ability to appeal to EVERYONE. God i hope nintendo wins this generation to shut up all the tech spec comparing faggots up.
 
One N64 game doesnt save an entire console.
Were you even following them at the time?
PS1 trampled N64 COMPLETELY. After Goldeneye, Zelda, Perfect Dark and maybe Turok 2, the system went downhill. All its last games to come out were absolute garbage.
The N64 was a bigger fuckup than Cube. Atleast cube had more than a couple of decent games and better 3rd party support before it ended up sucking also.
 
Its obvious we will never see eye to eye.
Nintendo fanboys love their marios and zeldas.
Xbox fanboys love their Halos and Dead or Alives.
Bottom line still remains 360 games > Wii games.
Infact, Xbox 1 games > GCN games.

Cube had shit all games and shit all 3rd party support.
Wii looks this way also.
Theres more 3rd party game announced for 360 than Wii.
 
You would make a good South Park character

I really don't care to prove you wrong, if I want graphics I play on my PC. PC > consoles

You are trolling, any statement that someone has posted to even try to debate you you shoot right back down with retarded logic. IE: Of course the 360 has MORE great games currently it has a year on the Wii. If it didn't have those games I would be worried.
 
Man stop talking out of your ass.
Even games like Mario galaxy, Metroid, etc dont look any better than Xbox and they are developed for Wii ground up so your PowerPC theory goes out the window.

Xbox360 does everything better than Wii so far, more games, better games, better graphics, better online, more features, more 3rd party support, etc.

Right now the Wii has the most subpar games along side PS3.
If you cant see that, you are such a blind fanboy.
Man Nintendo fanboys have always been ignorant.
 
odd, i didnt see the stellar games and amazing graphics on xbox. to me that thing is and always will be a halobox. those were the only good titles worth owning. other than that, it was a worthless system to me. the games were all mediocre at best. soon as 360 was about to launch, i took that piece of crap halobox, which hadnt been played in months, and quickly traded it in towards the 360..... something with GOOD games on it atleast.
 
If you actually compared Xbox 360's launch titles to the PS3's you'd be surprised that most games actually looked better on the 360.

Resistance is basically the only launch PS3 game to outdo 360's.
Every other 360 game looks better than what was on PS3.
 
This is a stupid discussion. It's probably true that a large majority of XBox titles will look better than most of the stuff the Wii will have available. Give the Wii some time though for developers to tap into the hardware capabilites, then start judging.

All that is beside the point. Nintendo stripped the Wii down so that it could make the price tag significantly less than the PS3 / XBox 360. Their plan to dominate the market in terms of reeling in non-gamers and people attracted to the innovative control system outweighs their need to produce games that look pretty. Once they gain a significant foothold of the console market (and profit quite a bit off Wii sales), then they can turn their focus to pretty graphics.

I still don't understand why people make such a big deal about Hi-Def output. A majority of households still lack HD capable TVs, and they don't need to upgrade until late 2008/early 2009 when broadcasts are forced to switch over to HD. I don't cry myself to sleep over the fact that I lack amazing textures when playing video games. That's not why I play them. It could be different for other people, but I try to have fun first and foremost.
 
Yes, I had both consoles. Both were awesome consoles, I phased my N64 out of play once certain games were released on the PS1.

http://www.gamerankings.com/itemrankings/simpleratings.asp?rankings=y

N64 produced 3 best games of all time in the top 10 chart. You cant call it a flop. Apart from that though, Majoras Mask, Mario 64, Rogue Squadron, Jet Force Gemini, Banjo-Kazooie, 1080 Snowboarding & Blast Corps were all incredible games.
 
Well calling it a gimmick is retarded as the Wii has already proven its not just a gimmick.

Wii - a few weeks old console
Xbox - 5 years old console

If the Wii can produce the 9th best game of all time at launch, wait 1-2 years and see what the games are like then.


The Wii version uses more advanced graphic options. Its been said in many reviews that the GC version doesnt use all of the graphical effects. IGN says it in the GC version preview. Its pretty much a given though.

The Wii is 1.5x more powerful than the gamecube GPU in terms of graphics, it produces better quality textures/graphics.

Saying all that though, the point of the Wii is (which the original poster seems to forget) is the innovative controller system that works better than an analog stick. Playing Zelda:TP without the remote isnt the same.
 
Zelda: TP is a sub par game? I dont remember any 360 launch title doing anywhere near as good...


This whole thread is fucking retarded. Nintendo have continually proved in the past by shitting all over the competition with quality gameplay and lower graphically demanding games.
 
The Wii is basically an uprated GCN which was said all along.
Its still not on the same playing field as Xbox.

Come back to me when Wii has any fighting games atleast to DOA3's graphical level.
Smash Bros on Wii looks almost identical to the Cube version.
Seriously all this its all about teh gameplay talk is leading wii devs to become lazy and use this excuse to hide the fact they dont want to spend time making their games look worth while.
 
I hate to keep flogging a dead horse here where its all about the graphics.
But seriously, this is true. Why cant the Wii, a brand new system with slightly better hardware (claimed) cant produce HD or amazing graphics to atleast Xbox 1 standard at launch?

I have found proof for those who stated my screens were not true game captures and high res dev shots.

Now look at Dead or Alive 3 on this HDTV:






Seriously, I couldnt care if the Wii is innovative or fun.
The point here is, we are getting ripped off.

I wouldn't mind it if the Wii was $150 but when the console costs 250 and 162 of that is pure profit for Nintendo it makes me very suspicious why they couldn't have kept the same price point had a more advanced chipset and didn't gouge the consumer as much. Wii is hot now cause its new and its cheap but by the end of this console console generation the Wii will be looked upon as a huge joke.
When you compare games like Gears of War to the best looking FUTURE Wii titles its not even in the same league.

Blah blah blah I know its not about the graphics Wii is about the games but too bad you can get a 360 for $50 more and you will get way better graphics, dolby surround sound, HD support, more games, better games, better online, more features, better exclusives, etc.

Nintendo want to try and be different but thats why the N64 and Cube went down the shitter.
Once people see past the controller, its going to be nothing more than the gamecube they've been playing for the past 5 years IMHO.
 
You obviously havent seen 360 in HD. The difference is massive compared to Wii in SD.

I told you I'm not trolling, stop being a pussy hurt fanboy.
Only reason I said Xbox has more great games is because you like every other nintendo fanboy out there keep using the "its all about the gameplay" reponse like 360 doesnt have any good "gameplay" games on it.

Like I said you obviously havent seen 360 in HD or you wouldnt be all high and mighty with your pc.
Besides, how many great games are coming to PC? I think Xbox360 has stolen almost all of them.
 
Back
Top