Why are the experts picking the Chicago Bears to finish dead last in the NFC North?

I highly doubt they are predicting that. The experts don't really know that much anyway, and there is no way Chicago finishes behind Minnesota. Minnesota sucks, their defense isn't as good as it was, their QB might be Ponder, or maybe Jackson, or Webb, either way, their QB isn't very good, and the receivers really don't matter because they have no QB to get it to them, the only thing they have is a good line, and a great running back, so Minnesota is finishing last. Chicago at least has a good defense, they have a solid running game, they have a decent QB (he likes to turn the ball over, but he isn't bad). The Bears will be either second or third, probably second, Detroit is too young to be second just yet. They have a lot of young talent, but I'd expect 1 or 2 more mediocre years for them until they have like a 10 win season in a couple years, but Chicago will most likely be second but miss the WC by a game (or possibly beat NY out for it, I predict a battle between those two for the last WC spot, the first one will be the Saints or Atlanta, whoever doesn't win the division), followed by Detroit, then Minnesota last. Packers should win.
Packers- 13-3
Bears- 10-6
Lions 7-9
Vikings 3-13
 
I don't know who these experts that u are referring to.The Vikings and Lions both have major questions at QB.The Packers are still the team to beat but I would not question the heart of Cutler.A man does not get that far in the NFL and quit!
 
The Lions don't have a QB who can play a half a season and the Vikings apperently don't know who their QB is.Then you question a man who has one of the crappiest offensive lines in the league who took more hits then anybody in the NFL.No experts are not picking the Bears for last.Little boys who have no understanding of the sport are
 
Back
Top