Where's Blake?

On Fri, 01 Apr 2011 08:39:32 -0600, Janet Bostwick
wrote:


Oh Puh-leeze... I've never yet encountered a prego woman who got
depressed when someone comments her bosoms were expanding... I doubt
very much it saddens any women when she has to buy a larger cup
size... sure doesn't sadden me! ;)
 
On 01/04/2011 2:07 PM, Brooklyn1 wrote:



I don't know about women being thrilled about men commenting on their
size breast. It is like the use of "the N... word". They don't mind
other women making the comment, and they commonly make a
self-congratulatory comment, but it is not a good idea for a man to say
it. All of a sudden it becomes objectionable because it means that men
are fixed on women's breast. We are, but so are they.
 
Dave Smith wrote:

You don't know much about women... you talk like someone who has never
been with a women, are you gay... do you really think women flaunt
their boobs for other women... well some do but the majority dress
primarily to attract men. I've yet to meet a women who hasn't
appreciated flattering remarks about her figure... probably you just
don't know how. This is the first time I've heard someone refer to
breasts as tantamount to the N word... your mamma must've done
something very bad to you. No normal woman is truly offended by men
ogling them, most especially pregnant women.... pregnant women crave
all the complimentary/positive comments/karma about their figure as
they can get. The one thing they don't want to hear is how that
maternity outfit makes their ass look big... hey, got back is good
too. LOL
 
On 01/04/2011 3:18 PM, Brooklyn1 wrote:



Me? Gay? Nope. I was never in the navy.



Yes... sometimes


I know more who would be offended and think off such comments as lechery.


I didn't say that breasts are tantamount to "the N word". I referred to
who is allowed to talk about them and comment on them.


I guess that explains why oglers and lechers are so highly regarded.
 
On Fri, 01 Apr 2011 15:58:33 -0400, Dave Smith
wrote:


By editing the contextural points to change the meaning of what I
wrote indicates that you lost any argument you might have had and that
you're a smarmy dishonest bastard, but I always knew that you're a
douchebag.
 
Dave Smith wrote in
news:[email protected]:


Didn't you work in the fashion industry? ;-) Don't take it so
personally. Sheldon often comes to the wrong conclusion, because
he doesn't really understand complex statements.


Most definitely. Women dress up to impress other women,
especially when they already have boyfriends or husbands. Just
because they dress up nice does not mean they want see
prognathous miens drooling within spotting distance.

Obviously, Sheldon is referring to a limited corpus of women you
can call up and have come to your house (or motel room) and give
you a massage with "happy ending".


They are usually Republican congressmen, aren't they?

Most assuredly, women who enjoy being objects of lechery from
strangers have serious self-esteem issues (or as Charlie Harper
puts it, "daddy issues").

But as Betty Friedan (IIRC) said, there are times when it is ok
for a woman to enjoy being a sex object as long as that is not
all she is. Within a relationship and as long as it is
consensual, anything is fine.

--

The Bible! Because all the works of science cannot equal the
wisdom of cattle-sacrificing primitives who thought every
animal species in the world lived within walking distance of
Noah's house.
 
Janet Bostwick wrote in
news:[email protected]:





I don't know about the 'wounding' bit, but I actually learnt something
from what Mark said, and the URL's he provided. From those, I've actually
gone on to read more about the operation I had, and the consequences etc,
rather than just rely on what one or two surgeons tell me.

And at the end of the day, Smurf only has a bleeding ulcer. No biggie.

I'm sure that if it was anything more serious, he'd know about it by now.


--
Peter Lucas
Hobart
Tasmania

Nothing ever truely dies
the Universe wastes nothing
everything is simply... transformed
 
"Nancy Young" wrote in news:4d9603bc$0$3042
[email protected]:




Smurf? Worry?? !!!!

He knows he has a bleeding ulcer, which would probably mean that he has
gone and had 'internal checks'.... which would mean that biopsies have
been taken and the all clear given as far as Gastric Cancer goes.
Otherwise he'd be on here trying to get even more sympathy outta you lot.

Mark was just relaying a titbit of info that the H.pylori virus/bacteria
*has* been known (albeit in small numbers) to cause Gastric Cancer.

Hardly a "worry bomb".


--
Peter Lucas
Hobart
Tasmania

Nothing ever truely dies
the Universe wastes nothing
everything is simply... transformed
 
Mark Thorson wrote in news:[email protected]:

$3016
caught
and



"Emotional types" = drama queens.


And get those poor damn peanuts into the shade and give them some water!!!

--
Peter Lucas
Hobart
Tasmania

Nothing ever truely dies
the Universe wastes nothing
everything is simply... transformed
 
Michel Boucher wrote in
news:[email protected]:




(Uggggghh!!!) I've seen quite a few of those types on "Cops".... *GODDAM*
they are UGLY!!!!


And yet 'men' like shelldumb still pay them their $5-$15 for the 'pleasure'.


--
Peter Lucas
Hobart
Tasmania

Nothing ever truely dies
the Universe wastes nothing
everything is simply... transformed
 
On Fri, 1 Apr 2011 10:23:08 -0400, "Nancy Young"
wrote:


Sometimes mental masturbation is necessary I think. A year ago I was
in a pretty bad rut to the point Louise even threatened to leave. I
dug my brain out of the pit and we're still together and happier than
ever.


I try not to and if I get negative there's someone here that has no
problem telling me so.

Lou
 
On Fri, 01 Apr 2011 15:58:33 -0400, Dave Smith
wrote:



shemps obsession with ginormous boobs is very strange. He can turn
almost any thread into a boob commentary. Kinda like how 12 year old
boys behave.

Lou
 
Lou Decruss wrote in
news:p[email protected]:


Kinda? I'd say "exactly".

--

The Bible! Because all the works of science cannot equal the
wisdom of cattle-sacrificing primitives who thought every
animal species in the world lived within walking distance of
Noah's house.
 
On Sat, 02 Apr 2011 10:38:09 -0500, Michel Boucher
wrote:


I don't always agree with you but this time you're spot on. What's
pathetic is he really thinks he's funny or amusing.

Lou
 
On Sun, 03 Apr 2011 17:23:58 -0600, gloria.p wrote:


Catz *is* TIAD. He's an expert.

ObFood: Bulgogi tri-tip (home made tonight). Olive oil and herb
roasted petit potatoes,a dn jalapenos stuffed with home made
Portuguese choriso, manchego cheese, and scallions.

Pictures in ABF later.

-sw
 
In article ,
Lou Decruss wrote:


I'm not so sure. I've met at least some 12 YO boys who are much more
mature than that.


So do those particular 12 YO boys.

--
Dan Abel
Petaluma, California USA
[email protected]
 
Back
Top