What's wrong with protecting a private businesses rights?

  • Thread starter Thread starter BobBarkersSoup
  • Start date Start date
It's amazing how often you are able to demonstrate your complete lack of even remote understanding of our position.

LOL ONLY A RACIST COULD HAVE A PROBLEM WITH IT LOL

Fucking retard.
 
Shouldn't their rights be protected just like an individuals?

If a private business makes decisions that piss people off, like not serving people based on race or religion, then wouldn't the general public, if they don't agree with their views, act against it and not patronize their business?

It should be the businesses right to do whatever they want, they will pay for it by losing customers if people don't agree and then they will go out of business.
 
What about Mexican/Chinese/Thai/Indian restaurants being forced to hire white people?
 
It's still funny how you think fraud and deceit is comparable to choosing who you associate with.
 
YES IT'S OBVIOUS HE SUPPORTS MURDER HOW DID I NOT SEE THE ERRORS OF MY WAYS. IT'S AMAZING I DID NOT SEE THE CONNECTION BEFORE.
 
He said he thinks people should be able to do what they want. Why limit it just to discrimination?
 
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all businesses are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights,
 
It's a moral issue too. Morals: The thing conservatives preach, unless it gets in the way of bashing minorities and preaching the infallability of the constitution.
 
i suppose it might come to that in 100 years or more, but if the barometer for success is avoiding the social climate that existed before 1964 then i'd say it's a trivial matter right now.
 
Seems to me that "supporting" it would be patronizing businesses that engage in the practice.
 
Private business. We aren't talking about government institutions that are publicly funded, we are talking about a private business. No one has any inherent right to anyone else's business services.

I suppose the government should mandate everyone have at least 5 friends of different races from their own. Why should we allow citizens to decide who they want to associate with? That will just foster more racism, so we need to do something to prevent that, force people to interact with others races.

What difference is there between forcing business owners who to do business with, and forcing citizens who to interact with?

Now if you're talking about government institutions or anything publicly funded, that's a completely different story. Don't confuse issues.
 
There are many forms of rational intolerance. Upscale restaurants will not tolerate loud or disruptive behavior, or customers who refuse to wear shoes.

As we noted earlier in the conversation, discriminatory practices are unworkable on large scales for the reason you mentioned. My concern is for the needless suffering that would occur when there are lags or gaps in competition.
 
They take the Hippocratic oath. Refusal of service based on race, ethnicity, etc would violate that oath, something they agreed to when they chose that profession. Is the Hippocratic oath a violation of free market principles?
 
What about refusal based on income? If someone can't afford to get treatment then aren't they discriminating also?
 
"Fair" is a bullshit, nonsensical catch-all. Try to use precise language and you'll see that your position is without merit.

Using force is never good business.
 
Back
Top