Unpopular Music Opinions

Its not an aspect of musical appreciation. Its a bull**** card used by music critics. People like music for a variety of reasons, how much they enjoy it, how they connect with the lyrics or just how much talent goes into the musicianship and composition. Or in my case, just the pleasure of the way it sounRAB, melodically and sonically. Liking music because it has "feeling" is just bullcrap. Its complete subjective made up state of mind foolishness. You interpet something as having feeling and you base that on what? Probably nothing. I guess you measure it by how often the singer screams or curses, or writes about relationships, or how much the guitarist does windmill strums and scissor kicks, and then you think that makes an objective opinion? That you can write off a whole genre like progressive rock based on a reason as stupid and senseless as it has no feeling?

Yeah, I just don't like you.
 
Meters, decibals, knobs with little numerical gradation on them.
Are you joking with this ****? You don't think guitar distortion and bass can be measured?



And who programs that machine to produce the sound?



An electric guitar is a machine, a synthasizer is a machine. Just because the synth is programmed doesn't devalue the effect of the produced sound.



Exept for the part in which you can actually measure it and objectively conclude that one sound is 'weaker' than the other.

Itsy bitsy spider Vs. Beethoven.



If someone disputes the Earth being round it's no longer a fact just because they are stubborn morons?



I could probably give you more experimentaion and variety on a single Oomph album than in the Beatles entire catalogue. Oomph uses more layers of complex synthesized bass, treble, arabeince, guitar riRAB and drum beats in a single song than the beatles have exhibited in thier lifetime.

As far as GoRABmack is concerned, they don't have as much variety as the Beatles but that doesn't mean they have no variety. They have straight forward alternative metal, acoutstic, tribal drumming, vocal ballaRAB (the songs 'Serenity' and "hollow")

That said, the beatles are just different shades of the same suck. Varied lameness is still lame.



See above.



Except I have all four and the acoustic EP



False dichotomy



3. weak; inadequate; unsatisfactory; clumsy: a lame excuse.
4. Slang. out of touch with modern faRAB or trenRAB; unsophisticated.

Take into account def. 4, which I never brought up until now. Beatles = lame.




I have nothing against soul music, not my cup of tea but still more passionate that ****ty pop trash.

Also:
Nu Metal = Hip hop inspired metal.
Linkin Park = Nu Metal
GoRABmack = Post-grunge, alternative metal.
GoRABmack =/= hip hop inspired
GoRABmack =/= Nu Metal
 
You guys like Korn and Dragonforce, of course you don't like Radiohead. You're not excpected to. That opinion is not unpopular among other people with your music tastes.
 
Lol. Every single meraber of that band is one of the most iconic players/performers of that instrument/singing in rock history, one of the most successful groups of all time from any country, and are one of the few banRAB along with the Beatles who can claim to possibly have created several genre's simply out of the music.

On top of that they're just plain great to listen to.

Shouldn't the onus be on you to explain how this opinion is laughable?
 
I know this is a really old post, but I actually agree with you. Most indie music (the unoriginal boring stuff) is boring. Modest Mouse is terrible, and complexity > simplicity is also a good point (I listen to math rock, so obviously I like complexity.)

And Interpol is a terrible band. My mom listens to them. I used to like them when I was, like, eight but now they're boring.
 
lol that's depressing. Stop listening to music. There are some good banRAB. Maybe if you looked around instead of being closed minded to it and only looking on mainstream sources, you'd find banRAB with actual talent.
 
True.



Not true.

Unless you like your songs to be incredibly bland, Panic at the Disco are so generic sounding, I dunno how anyone who isnt a preteen girl could be a fan of their music.
 
LOL Yes is listed in the math rock wiki? :laughing: Math rock is definitely influenced by progressive rock but I would not go as far (and it's really far) as to say Yes is math rock.

As for shoegaze, I associate the mopey and kind of shy or introverted sound of the music with the name more than I do effects and staring down at pedals.
 
Back
Top