Ultimate Guide To Folding@home

another quote:



EDIT: found more stuff...

Crunch like mad? Use these switches for an AMD processor:

-forceSSE -advmethods

For an Intel processor:

-advmethods is all you need.

Want the client to talk to you as much as it can? Add this switch:

-verbosity 9
 
Livy said:
:D good luck to anyone whos gonna catch vb.

also lynx will probably be passing me soon.
Well done Livy.

If things don't improve I won't be passing anyone, I'm fed up of having my work lost by the servers, almost 1000 points so far since they introduced that so called "collection server". If I'd had those I really would be snapping at your heels.
 
jaigandhi5 said:
lol :lol: i know the link i just want my sig pic to link to it... :lol:
Code:
[url=http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/showthread.php?p=878382][img]http://img80.exs.cx/img80/6649/Untitled-1copy100.jpg[/img][/url]
Simple enough :)

Congrats on the 14th place. With only 1 computer folding im folding like a turtle lately. :(

edit: Wtf is up with the code thing. If it's going to show the end result then what's the point. :dry:
 
10 A_Fish 11067.2 148
11 AudioAlterations 10513.2 155
12 Clocker 10177.1 279


I did mention this before, but the post has disapeared... Welcome to the 10,000 + "club" !
 
Originally posted by jaigandhi5@31 January 2004 - 12:19
another quote:



but would this work on P4s?
I assume the windows client is optimized for Intel CPUs by default, and therefor Intel-based rigs don't need many switches.

Running Folding@Home has shown that AMD CPUs are awsome performers, but they need to be cared for, like any race-horse :rolleyes:

Folders on AMD CPUs have to find out which switches work best for them.
When you do want optimum performance you need a very stable machine with good cooling.
When you don't want optimum performance, you could fold without using a switch at all.

But, if you can't accept Lamsey outranking you ( like I can't ), you'll need the switches or a whole lot more machines. :01:

Fold on ! :)
 
Back
Top