Ultimate Guide To Folding@home

It's not the position you are in that's important...it's the fact that you're doing it...thats what's important!

This is great, the team is growing larger, every day... :)
 
You've got something seriously wrong there, it takes me about 36hrs to process project 638. Maybe it just hasn't been running long enough to work out the speed, since it hasn't completed a frame yet.
 
I just noticed that there are already 47 KLB members folding! Perhaps it would be a good idea to request a new members group, as it might encourage more members to start folding@home... :)
 
Originally posted by Rocktron@18 May 2004 - 18:53
Damn ,

My folding stopped for some reason.
None of my work get's completed anymore. at least 2 days of work down the drain.
Deleted my work folder many times now and started over....

Did i miss a update or something? :( :blink:
Click to expand...
We have had a few warmer days just now Rock.
Is there any chance heat is the problem?

Like in "Sun shining on your case" or,
"Dust and cobwebs on yyour heat-sink" :ph34r:

Most times when you delete a work unit you'll just get the same one handed out over and over.

Yeah it sucks, been there, done that..... :angry:
 
im going away tomorrow till friday, so i may be folding a little less, i'll have my laptop with me, and no internet access. so ive got a bunch of the deadline less f@h WU in a batch, to keep it going. and another machine may be off too, so i may be don to one machine, so no overtaking while im away. :D
 
Virtualbody1234 said:
I can't believe how many inactive members there are. :cry:


But you've been inactive since: 11.13.05
Click to expand...

...that's not strictly true, my girlfriend (Dutch)

3 Dutch 13372 129


has ambushed my two computers and is contributing to an other folding@home team..so when I , sometime in the near future, in the holst of the night, change the team number back to 34905 and pray she doesn't notice ..then I would still be contributing to the team with multi processors... it just seemed a good idea. In the end every work unit that gets folded, goes to wards the good cause. It's just more fun when everyone is playing on an even playing field :) The spirit of competition...thought it might encourage a few sports to see if their computers have got what it takes...

:)
 
Code: 
[20:59:38] Folding@home Gromacs Core
[20:59:38] Version 1.56 (February 2, 2004)
[20:59:38] 
[20:59:38] Preparing to commence simulation
[20:59:38] - Looking at optimizations...
[20:59:38] - Created dyn
[20:59:38] - Files status OK
[20:59:40] - Expanded 388311 -> 1861229 (decompressed 479.3 percent)
[20:59:40] - Starting from initial work packet
[20:59:40] 
[20:59:40] Project: 858 (Run 361, Clone 6, Gen 1)
[20:59:40] 
[20:59:40] Assembly optimizations on if available.
[20:59:40] Entering M.D.
[20:59:47] Protein: p858_p53dimer858
[20:59:47] 
[20:59:47] Writing local files
[20:59:48] Extra SSE boost OK.
[20:59:48] Writing local files
[20:59:50] Completed 0 out of 2500000 steps
 
What's going on here?

If you look at the 24hr points avge, in most cases it is the weekly points divided by 7. But not always.

Livy: 61=395/6.5
Lamsey: 55=339/6
Dr Spud: 15=72/5
VB1234: 66=397/6
SummerLinda: 20=66/3

I realise that the stats are new and will probably correct themselves once they've been going a little longer, but can anyone explain these anomolies?
 
And a big WELCOME for a new folder on out stats page !

:clap: :clap: J'Pol has joined the ranks with his Athlon 1200 :clap: :clap:

His poor machine must have been chewing for days on that big 71 point Tinker :D

Tough to swallow, those WUs, huhhh J'Pol ? :P
 
Back
Top