Seeing as 82 is barely visible out West, the 72.5 is a non starter.
Unless they begin to carry channels on a regional basis.
But I think all or most of the French MUST be a national carry.
If you do like Dish did and use central core sats for main English and wing birds like their 148 and 61.5 are almost mirrors of each other, then in the Bev case, it would be 82 core English, 72.5 East and replicated on 91 for West.
That still doesn't give them more capacity.
A better orbital slot might help.
The 107 & 111 birds that Telesat operates do a fine job of National coverage being positioned over the central part of the country and have demonstrated sufficient signal to support the extra margins required for 8PSK.
Off course, that would require a complete Dish/LNB swap, but would that be cheaper than an equipment swap?
If only the same signals could be used by both providers, and a sub could choose based on packaging, pricing and service.
We'd end all the controversy of whose signals are compressed the most and the security issue would evaporate.
Add in the existing bird and build a Canadian Superdish with 111/107/92, use 8PSK and MPEG4 as 1/2 the job is already done and Canadians could enjoy the 100+ HD that our Yankee buddies are starting to enjoy.
Let the Feds disband the CRTC and we'd have ample content to fill the birds.
If your a Metro customer, you bundle with Bev for DSL and wireless and get pricing. In rural, you might choose the *C guys, out West, you could bundle with Shaw Internet and Digital Phone.
Lots of very interesting possibilities that would be a definite benefit to consumers.
Anybody remember USSB on the 101 bird years ago.
1 STB, 2 providers, 1 technology.
Why not?