Yes, but once it's all said and done, the Living TV Group will only consist of Challenge and Living TV. Channel One is going. Bravo is going.
It'll be bought out and they'll have to find somewhere else with immediate effect.
On freeview, it would be pretty good, but Sky3, and Sky2 are seen as just inferior versions of Sky1, whereas Bravo was arguably the second most successful channel under the VMTV banner.
When a programme doubles, trebles or quadruples its ratings on the previous year, that's pretty outstanding.
Bravo has a very strong line-up of male-orientated programming, like Alex Reid's programmes, etc etc. The fact TNA doesn't make the top 10 frequently is irrelevant.
We already know that SmackDown does much better over here on its premier than RAW, but RAW has only just started to see an improvement in its viewing figures. You're talking like RAW has been top every week this year, and that is by far not the case.
Sky don't have to honour the contract? Well isn't that... erm.. illegal? What's the point of a contract, then? (Although, to be fair, Sky are known for not honouring various contracts and manipulating situations to benefit themselves. They always have. They always will.)