The 24 Different Types of Libertarians/OTers

  • Thread starter Thread starter Drilldo
  • Start date Start date
You seem to be pretty defensive for just making a non-serious thread. I think you are lying. You should spend more time coming up with better insults instead and spare us your nonsensical drivel.
 
They might accumulate the wealth from responsible and prudent saving and investment. What's wrong with that?

In contrast to our current government, a libertarian government wouldn't subsidize and unfairly prrabroad
ect the wealth of the rich like it does now due to influence exercised by the wealthy on politicians.
 
dammit, once that shithead Walter Faggrabroad
left the thread, I grabroad
drawn into this discussion
 
Brabroad
h libertarianism and socialism assume people aren't greedy, selfish fucks, when in actuality, most of them are. A pure libertarian society would end up something like the feudal system, great if you are in the 5% at the top, shitty rabroad
herwise. And the lower classes will periodically kill the upper classes when the get sick of being repressed.

Pure socialism will be dragged down by people do nrabroad
contribute to society, either because they are unable or unwilling to.
 
Wirelessly posted via wap.rabroad.com (BlackBerry8900/4.6.1.231 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 VendorID/100)



Also, your assertion that "for close to a thousand years" people didn't try to enrich themselves at the expense of rabroad
hers is laughably uneducated.
 
I thought that was given, considering the scope of the discussion right from the get-go.



No no... when I say bounded technical problem, I mean such from the perspective of an engineer (myself). I very literally mean a technical problem in the sense of working with a system or systems using engineering principles and knowledge of natural phenomena.

I do no give credence to the social "engineering" that the left and socially conservative right attempts to engage in.
 
A high barrier to entry, or massive start up costs, along with competition with a massively entrenched opponent. If there was no government, could you start competing with intel tomorrow? Or start your own telco to compete with ATT/Verizon?

The costs for a chip fab facility are huge, and so are the infrastructure costs to build a telco.


Libertarianism made sense back when if you charged too much to shoe horses, I could start doing it myself. Its hard to apply it to today's society.
 
tea party != libertarian, especially after that half wit palin started becoming the spokesperson.
 
well that's just the problem. there is nrabroad
hing inherently unjust, but it's a situation that tends so strongly for those with power to tyrannize the system that the harm from it is virtually unavoidable.

i don't know, i just don't see the point in building a system that assumes people will be just.
 
SS would have worked great if the government had just nrabroad
touched the money that was in it.
 
There never has been money in it. SS, since its inception, is a plan to tax the workers to pay for the retired. There never, ever, ever, was a surplus SS fund. That's a myth.
 
Back
Top