Y
yanceylebeef
Guest
Get out of my head!
Though the reasoning may be idiotic, I can't say I disagree with the final result.As I said, if the reason for Bush not giving her the medal was because he thought her writing was mediocre, that wouldn't be stupid at all. But his reason for not giving her the medal is because of witchcraft, which is stupid.
Well, then, put in oversights of whatever committee-head she might become. Not oversights on the first lady.The continuation of that train of thought is that if she is not elected, not on the Federal payroll, and has not been confirmed by the Senate, she should not be in charge of anything.
She has:Equipoise said:Move over Michelle!
And along those same lines:
Republican Councilman Lee Barnes of Arizona apologized for saying, regarding finances, "Excuse my action but I
Representative Lynn Jenkins (R - Kansas) said that the GOP is searching for a great white hope. But she didn't mean that in racial terms.
Dana Perino on Hannity said:"I don't know all of their thinking that goes into it, but we did not have a terrorist attack on our country during President Bush's term. I hope that they're not looking into this politically."
The files disappeared and turned up a week later in the Clinton living quarters.What matters is that it didn't fucking happen. Did. Not. Happen. Happened? It did not.
In a court of law, yes. In the court of public opinion, not so much. For example, how do you feel re 'Bush lied' to get us into Iraq? There is absolutely no way to know what Bush's thinking was, and there was evidence, believed by most of the world's intelligence agencies and Bill and Hillary Clinton themselves, that Iraq possessed or was developing WMD. But none were found so the overwhelming attitude around here is that "Bush lied". Where's your forensic evidence there?Diogenes the Cynic said:Actually, yes it does. That's the way it works in America. No evidence = presumption of evidence.
Correct.Diogenes the Cynic said:Starr said he found no evidence whatsoever. Neither forensic or testimonial. Absolutely no reason to believe it happened.
Not true. I'm making allegations of mysterious happenings with regard to files from Foster's office. (Which aren't actually 'allegations' at all, but matters of fact.)Diogenes the Cynic said:You are making accusations of evidence tampering against Hillary based on nothing.
The allegations I've made are totally supported by the facts. The inference to be drawn from them is obviously a matter of political persuasion.Diogenes the Cynic said:It's beyond asinine to make totally unsupported allegations, and then say that everybody else has to prove they're false.
That simply isn't true. There may have been nothing to it, or there may have been something to it which was successfully removed or destroyed and which subsequently prevented it from coming to light.[quote=Diogenes the Cynic said:]Let me tell you, if your boy, Starr, couldn't find anything or get anybody to squeal, there was less than nothing to it.
I understand you're only stating a devil's advocate position, but if she wasn't elected, and she's not on the federal payroll, then federal oversight of her 'position' is really inappropriate.
The continuation of that train of thought is that if she is not elected, not on the Federal payroll, and has not been confirmed by the Senate, she should not be in charge of anything.
What.President Obama's being attacked for his choice of condiments. Condiments! I realize that Hannity is already a total loonball, but now he's being joined by other loonballs in a full-blown case of Dijon Derangement Syndrome.
Does the base really need to be propped up this badly? OMG SOCIALIST!! WHO LIKES FANCY-PANTS MUSTARD!!
They're a laughingstock.