XxMaThIaSxX
New member
I don't know much about either really.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
so is the PS3 that much superior to the Xbox360 to justify the cost difference?
- Thread starter XxMaThIaSxX
- Start date
LOLLOBSTER
New member
[No message]
Little Miss Pipedream
New member
if you want an hd dvd player...maybe. other than that, no IMO
crackennbottles
New member
does the PS3 play games in 1080i or 1080p?
The Duchess of Blyth
New member
p
lalala2512
New member
http://xboxsystems.leanangle.net/index.php?title=lol_so_the_hd_era_starts_with_the_ps3_hu&more=1&c=1&tb=1&pb=1
fuck ... i have a "older" HD set
i'll stick with my 360 for now
fuck ... i have a "older" HD set
i'll stick with my 360 for now
krimsonowl
New member
are the 360's still having problems with breaking?
chaychayolei
New member
Its not worth it according to this I read today
in related news ign gave NFS: carbon a 8.2 for 360 and 7.9 for PS3
[/i]
and
[/b]
So far, it seems like the PS3 launch games aren't terribly exciting, except for Resistance of course.
Here's where things really start sucking for early adopters of the PS3... Not only is there a lack of a few must-have games, Need For Speed: Carbon, Marvel: Ultimate Alliance and Tony Hawk's Project 8 are also on Xbox 360. The disappointing thing is that the PS3 versions of these games fall short compared to the Xbox 360 versions. In the case of Need For Speed and Tony Hawk, they don't look as good (Marvel Ultimate Alliance does run in 1080P though) and all three of them have framerate issues.
Need For Speed is missing some "show off" features that the 360 version has. The 360 version allows you to pause the game at any time and take snapshots. You can then upload those photos online for others to check out. Tony Hawk takes the cake though.... no online play for the PS3 version like the 360 version. Ugh.
in related news ign gave NFS: carbon a 8.2 for 360 and 7.9 for PS3
[/i]
and
[/b]
So far, it seems like the PS3 launch games aren't terribly exciting, except for Resistance of course.
Here's where things really start sucking for early adopters of the PS3... Not only is there a lack of a few must-have games, Need For Speed: Carbon, Marvel: Ultimate Alliance and Tony Hawk's Project 8 are also on Xbox 360. The disappointing thing is that the PS3 versions of these games fall short compared to the Xbox 360 versions. In the case of Need For Speed and Tony Hawk, they don't look as good (Marvel Ultimate Alliance does run in 1080P though) and all three of them have framerate issues.
Need For Speed is missing some "show off" features that the 360 version has. The 360 version allows you to pause the game at any time and take snapshots. You can then upload those photos online for others to check out. Tony Hawk takes the cake though.... no online play for the PS3 version like the 360 version. Ugh.
The Duchess of Blyth
New member
real difference is the blu-ray player at a cheaper cost.
You can get the xbox hd-dvd player, but that'll put it in the same cost as a ps3, so no difference there imo
But i'm waiting for all the good games to come out before I jump in
ie. final fantasy, mgs, etc
You can get the xbox hd-dvd player, but that'll put it in the same cost as a ps3, so no difference there imo
But i'm waiting for all the good games to come out before I jump in
ie. final fantasy, mgs, etc
Fr3shAce24
New member
power wise, proberbly not. But the xbox is crippled by its DVD drive. Not enough room to future proof it (or even do current gen titles properly).