Shounen heroines and heroism

I don't want this to become a list thread, but I do want to thank people for their suggestions, which is to say, not everyone writes useless idiots like Orihime, where her point seems to be "I can help! Help I'm being kidnapped!"

"Orihime's been kidnapped. Must be Wenesday."

"I can fight! I can win! I'm being kidnapped! Help!"

That's what's frustrating. I don't think even Sayaka Yumi in the 70's was as helpless as that.
 
\

I thought he meant in manga terms.

Oh well. Anyway, I don't understand why it has to be limited to long running series. We're talking about shounen heroines, so why does it have to be limited to 50+ episode shows?
 
I did mean manga actually, and the length was sort of a litmus test to see if this stuff caught on or was summararily dumped in favor of the professional kidnapping victim types.
 
So I took a little time to reread parts of the sexism/feminism thread and the recent Bleach discussion and then came back. Personally, I'm drawn to strong & independent leaRAB from either gender myself. But let me play devil's advocate and ask a question: is there something inherently wrong with supportive heroines? Or is the real problem not the role, but the fact that for a very long time it was the common standard with very few exceptions to the rule? As you can probably guess, the second view is my own. I won't say that bias against heroines is an irrelevant issue, and I prefer to see a trend toward the stronger type. I'm a guy who thinks that we're due for a woman being the lead protagonist in a Gundam series.

That said, I don't think that the choice between support and independence indicates bad or good writing. I see a lot of talk here and there about whether heroine X is "useless" compared to others, but while some can be called wasted I'm very reluctant to judge based just on, say, the fights a heroine has been in or how they compare to characters in other series. Now yes, SJ series are driven by action, but the best ones usually have stories that stand out so fighting can't be the only grounRAB on which they are judged. My main concern is that, in our desire to wreck an old stereotype, we don't eventually establish a new one--if you aren't regularly kicking butt, you're no good. I don't think that's right. I think either choice is valid, and that it's up to the writer to make the choice work well.

I cite Kaoru and Megumi from Rurouni Kenshin, who I think are two of the better written women in any SJ series for the reasons said here (read the quote too!). Kaoru almost never fought in a battle of consequence and never really got stronger. But she was very important as Yahiko's teacher and as support to Kenshin, to the extent that she eventually became an essential part of his will to fight. Megumi is, to my mind, a nearly perfect example of an independent woman in a manga. She was a rock of support for Kaoru when it mattered, she could trade barbs with the thuggish Sanosuke, and she lived her life on her own terms even after not getting the guy. And she wasn't a fighter. But in theory--and I do not ascribe this view to anyone--couldn't we apply the Inoue logic to either of them and call them a loser? But that wouldn't be the truth.

Now RK is not your average title, but you see the point. The truth is that in reality people aren't all the same, so why should we demand the same qualities and levels of competancy in all heroines? I'm not seeing much demand for a strict standard for men. Inoue has been made out to be all but helpless lately, and I'd love to see that change. She's had to be saved too many times. But does it follow that she neeRAB a complete personality change to be "fixed"? Rukia, from the very same series, didn't need that.

Does Nami have to be as powerful as Sakura to be a good character? Most who follow One Piece would say no, and why is that? Because she is competant enough in the context of her series. Even more importantly than that there are merits to her character beyond fighting, I would argue. You could arguably make a similar case for Inoue, who is hung up over Ichigo but also got into trouble for the sake of everyone she knew. If she never improves like Rukia that would be a disappointment, but haven't we seen her character on display at least as much as a guy like Ishida?

Simply put, I'm all for equality. Bring on the strong women and the toraboys and all variations thereof. However, that doesn't mean that the support role has no value. By what right can I accept Kaoru and Megumi and not Sakura or Inoue? So personally, I'm content to accept the Namis and the Sakuras and Inoues and the Kaorus of the world. We don't have to be served just one or two, we just need good writing. I think the moment we transcend such close scrutiny of gender roles in fiction will be when we are generally just taking each character on his or her own terms, rather than how well that character represents his or her group. I have no illusions that such issues will just disappear one day, of course, but I see no reason to not get as close to the ideal as possible.
______________________

On the subject of powerful, independent heroines, I can think of another series that does it: Fairy Tail (published in shonen magazine) with Titania Ezra. This is a case where, as far as I've read, she is actually considerably stronger than both the male protagonist (Natsu) and his best friend. So much so, in fact, that they're actually afraid of her wrath, although normally they're actually as close as siblings. She's basically the one that takes it upon herself to enforce the rules of the guild that most of the series' characters are a part of. Nobody wants to mess with her. She's used for mild fanservice (she can change her armor to different forms on a whim) but also kicks butt. So, there's at least one clear cut case beyond One Piece.

Other cases of strong or much improved heroines in my book:

Nami (One Piece): Started off weak like Usopp, but has since gotten a lot better and earned herself a decent bounty.
Sakura (Naruto): Awful in part one. Powerful in part 2, the Sasori fight still looms large for me. She's also far more tolerable as a character, now that she's outgrown her childish quirks and both appreciates Naruto and cares about helping people. She's a good heroine.
Tsunade (Naruto): Not much fighting for her, but we know that she's strong and she's a great leader along with all her other assets (pun intended).
Robin (One Piece): You don't survive a backstory like hers and not be pretty damn strong. She also pulled an Inoue in an attempt to protect the Straw Hats, which took serious guts.
Rukia (Bleach): From support to damsel-in-distress to someone that managed to beat an Arrancar, albeit barely. She went all out to help Inoue. Good heroine, even though I'm skeptical that she'll get much stronger beyond where she is.
Tokiko (Buso Renkin): I almost feel bad to list her in this company, I don't like her or the series that much, but she started off pretty darn strong and even romance didn't really change her aggressive demenor in the series. Very low tier compared to the others, though.
Kaoru and Megumi (Rurouni Kenshin): See above.
 
I second that, I wanna see a female protagonist in a Gundam show too (and also I'm pushing for a female lead in the next series for Code Geass), I think it's a good change and also would make for an interesting premise

And honestly, I've always preferred the tough and toraboyish chicks (not to mention my strange crush on female Ranma), and sometimes the intelligent and cunning ones, but anyway, I haven't seen any female delinquent detectives, since Sukeban Deka (and most recently Burst Angel, but that was only for three episodes), and that's a trope that should probably be revisited
 
Maybe this should have been called "Orihime- worst female character EVER", because in the context of a supporting, competent character, I have no issue whatsoever with female supporting characters. If you have a use, you're OK.

But to be an active hindrance with no point other than to be such is another matter entirely. That is my issue with Inoue. She does nothing but believes she can help only to be brutally shot down from her pedastal of hope via a well timed kidnapping. This is not competent by any stretch. It's a joke, to go "Oh, look at that stupid Inoue, thinking she can actually fight. Hehe."
 
Feel free to add your input in that thread as well, if you haven't done so already XD

But as to the topic at hand, I will agree with you that a variety of female characters is the ideal, otherwise there is a danger with ending up with women never wear dresses, as you suggested .

Though I turn the question around and ask : How many supportive males are there, and do they get the same treatment as female supportive characters?

Personally I haven't seen many shounen with notable female characters in a while for me to contribute.., I am not a fan of fanservice, though, which is something I find many fighting shows that have female characters in them have.. though I do recognize that not all are excessive
 
That's fair enough. FWIW, my response is an answer to a lot of comments I've noticed related to shonen series going back a good ways. The latest discussion just gave me a good excuse to finally rant about them. It's true that this is a bit different from Rukia's rescue, given that Rukia had no powers to speak of at the time. Inoue does, but token resistance isn't much better than none. If Kubo's putting her through all this just to keep her the same distressed damsel as always, that really would be a shame considering that Rukia went through the same thing and then came back as a respectable ally.
 
Siya from Blood+ is a good examope of a Shonen Heroine...& I guess Rosario+vampire becasuse Moka is always Saving Tsukunes butt one way or another, Then Theres faye from cowboy bebop although I guess she's not technically a hero. & then theres Claymore, I can't thik of much else besides that.



I Recently Started reading Negima..But I can't really say theres any strong heroines in that..well besides Setsuana mabye, I tell you what though that series Is way to Ecchi for my taste, if it wern't so darn addicting I'd stop reading it..LOL.
 
That's the thing though, I like fanservice. I also realize that not everyone is cut out to be the warrior of the group. Some people are better strategists, others supporting cast. And there is nothing wrong with a female being feminine, nor should there be. I'll argue anyone who says otherwise.

However, what I'm rallying against is the Jar Jar. "My sole purpose for existing is to make the life of the group harder. For someone who's supposed to be cast in this "I want to fight" role, turning it into a parody/subversion of the archetype is an issue. Sakura was a Faux Action Girl who resolved to become stronger and eventually became a true Action Girl, without losing her femininity (and becoming a more likely object for the main's affection). Nami was brains, and ran with it to become useful. She's the reason the ship got to where it did, because Zoro sure as heck wasn't going to. The navigator/strategist model fit her perfectly, and she evolved into that from someone who wanted to be useful.

Inoue seems like a cruel parody of these two types, the girl who turns from jobber to uber-jobber.

"I want to be stronger, but I can't, no matter how hard I try. Why?"

"Because you're only here as eye candy and a plot device. Now start jumping while you wait to be kidnapped."

That is not human weakness. That's a badly written damsel in distress.
 
Its funny cause its true...Speaking of Bleach you can add Rukia, Soi fon & Yuroichi to the list of SHojo heroines, yes I know Rukia had to be rescued but that wasn't cause she was a Damsel in ditress, (Like orihime is LOL) she was following soul society law. Soi fon is tough & so is Yuroichi, I'd love to see the 2 fight enimes side by side some day in either the manga or the Anime!



As for my openion on fanservice I like it in small doses but to much makes me fill like a perv. (I mean the only reason I can't stop reading negima is basically beacuase of the NodakaXnegi sub-plot,Comeon Nodoka You can do it!! LULZ)
 
First let's clear up that Shakugan no Shana is not a shoujo. It's a shounen. Though it could be thought of as a seinen, it's not a shoujo. It's aimed at guys.

Now on topic, I am both going to agree and disagree on the Jar Jar count for Orihime. Okay, she is quite useless right now and I don't really see her taking any major plot-changing actions either. I mean, she is just sitting on the floor saying Kurosaki-kun more than just a few times. Even though I am a major IchiOri shipper, that doesn't really mean I'm not noticing how she has been shafted lately in the story. Her actions have degenerated from typical shounen Healer/Commentator to....well, not even commentator. More like, background noise. I mean, at least Rukia was in a tower so we knew that she literally could not do anything. That was addressed. And now, if the arc wasn't about rescuing her, I'd consider her a secondary character at best.

However, calling her the Jar Jar is a bit much. True, she is showing a low point, but at least I'm not irratated every time she's on screen...er....on page. I'm more just hoping that every time I see her, the next word out of her mouth is not "Kurosaki-kun." The reason I still hold Orihime in regard and not flat-out rejecting her usefullness to the story (unlike, say....Rurichiyo) is because she has potential. There is something that Kubo is planning on doing with her. But it hasn't happened and it may not happen for another half-year or so. Even the god-powers and reality-warping is really speculation since we haven't seen any of it yet. Though I'm sure we will soon enough. And by soon, I mean....um....sometime in the future of this publication

---------------------

I'd say that Maka is really more of the main character of Soul Eater to me and I do think that she is a strong character in her own right. I also think that more women need to be more like Faye Valentine or Yoruichi. You know, fanservice corabined with absolute badassery. That's more like it. Though unlike most people on the board, I don't really have a problem with moe. Just when it's used stupidly like Rosario+Vampire. God, I hate that show. It's not even funny.
 
Okay, I bet everyone is waiting for me, the Orihime Superfanboy, to defend my favorite character... And I'll admit, Orihime is a pretty weak fighter who hasn't defeated a single foe since she first got her powers. But I don't her for this, I blame the one in charge, Tite Kubo. Orihime has so much potential for being a good fighter, a cutie who could kick your ass if you will. But Kubo not just drops the ball, he furables it and the other team gets it and scores a touchdown.

Let's go back to when she first got her powers, the scene was pretty much a demo of what she can do now. And I loved that scene so much, whether it was her voice actor stepping up, the unique aspect of her powers, or the delivery itself. It showed the potential Orihime now had. But there hasn't been a moment like that since. It always leaRAB to her failing and having to be rescued by someone stronger. And whose fault is that? Tite Kubo.

And to the comparisons of her to JarJar Binks, I can only say..."I REJECT!" JarJar had nothing redeemable about him, added nothing to the plot, had no cool abilities to make up for his negatives. Orihime is way above that, let's say she's at Arcee level, just the girl character.

In closing, Orihime is a good character, Kubo though is a questionable writer.

Was the metaphor too much? I can never tell.
 
I agree pretty much with everything you just said, and I like fanservice and moe, but not when it's used just for it to be used, as for Rosario+Vampire, GONZO just took an actually decent manga, and turned it into something it's not
 
Why does it always have to be women? Can't a man have a man for the weak supporting character, or a woman have a woman? A woman having a man is more or less what girl shows tend to suffer from (a 'Take That!', if you will), so it's just replacing one problem with another. But why not have a woman as the main character in the exact same role? You could name examples I'm sure, but they're in the minority.

(Note: I know it's because society is so focused on gender roles and any situations that don't match what they've learned to expect frighten and confuse people, I'm just using questions as the answer. Ideally, you should be able to swap a characters gender and get the same character, but society is so focused on women acting like feminine and men acting masculine, that women tend to be regulated to the supporting role because that's how society acts. Notice how very few princes need rescuing. The problem stems basically is the same role has more or less been reserved for women)
 
Well, there is Shirou in Fate/Stay Night (though he gets stronger) and Tuxedo Mask in Sailor Moon, but I know what you mean. Those aren't shonen shows, and it's fair to say that they're exceptions to the rule. There is definitely a bias that I'd like to see balanced. Just not to such a degree that every girl character has to be a toraboy to be taken seriously. I don't think we've gone there, I just wanted to caution that we never should.
 
^^^
This is why I liked Nanoha. All the guys (That being only two guys) started becoming less and less useful as the series went on as the girls got power-ups to near-Gundam levels (That may or may not have been a good thing though) Though, I'm not sure its the best example, Nanoha was aimed at guys so I'm trying to pull examples out.

But it is truly a minority nowadays.
 
I'm not sure what to make of Tuxedo Mask to be honest, I've been trying to figure out how I feel about him ever since I saw the show years ago. On one hand he has his uses, but on the other hand his uses are... kind of lame and make the girls look even more incompetent. The girls will be struggling against the monster of the week, he'll show up to throw a rose and say some encouraging worRAB, then the girls will suddenly gain the power to use their signature attack and defeat the monster (I'm not sure why they dont just use the attack at the start if it just takes one hit to kill them). He was kind of a prince rescuing a group of princesses in distress. In the earlier episodes they also gushed over him. For every moment he makes guys in girl shows look better, he also kind of makes girls look even worse. Sort of like if he was the hero and the girls were the supporting character, but they were the ones who did the work and... um, I still can't figure out what to make of him But like you said, balance is the key, and I've only seen a handful of shows have balance.
 
It was my original intention to compare Orihime and Wheelie. But Wheelie killed a guy. (Five Faces of Darkness) It really seems to be that Orihime is a subversion rather than unrealized potential. I even have my doubts about an evil Orihime. It might be another subversion.

Orihime- feel my full power!

Chad- That attack was so weak even I wasn't hurt.

Aizen- Yeah, that whole "untapped god" thing? I lied. Your powers unleashed are about as threatening as a character from Rugrats.

Kon- Burn!

Orihime- I fail at everything!

Chad- You're still good at getting kidnapped. Speaking of...

Orihime- Even when I'm evil I get kidnapped!

As Marin stressed, balance is the key, and so is story. I don't want a series full of toraboys and weak males anymore than I want Orihime the Jar Jar. If this is the standard for a female protagonist in a shounen, (as opposed to a middle of the spectrum one like Karou or total opposite end like Lovely Warrior Cutey Honey) then there's an issue.
 
Wheelie? Oh come on! Knowing that miniseries, it was probably just an error. Arcee makes more sense. The some what ineffective female character who is decidedly feminine. Ulquiorra is Shockwave because he's cold like a robot. And Hitsuguya is Sideswipe because he gets fans even though he barely does anything.


No, I'm still gonna go with the latter. Because they didn't treat it like a subversion, atleast not intentionally.


So, now you think even if she became evil, Orihime still "suck"? Just asking.
 
Back
Top