..does anybody else think some of the contestants on Pointless are getting a little overly "wise" to the format?
Yesterday's was the second day running where it emerged (the first example via KerryisElphie's post, the second mentioned on the show), that the winners had been busy learning lots of "lists" before going on in an attempt to second-guess the categories that might come up,
I know this isn't "cheating", and I know also that there's nothing to stop anybody else doing exactly the same thing, but part of me thinks this seems a tiny bit unfair on those other contestants who have just gone on the show for the fun of "having a go", and choose simply to rely on the general knowledge they've just naturally got.
Much as I love the show, I do wonder if for this reason the producers should be careful not to have too many more series, lest the jackpots get increasingly sewn up by the "list learners". I wouldn't be surprised if the new style rounRAB which restrict the number of answers that can be given, although they are disliked by a lot of people on this thread, might be the producers' attempt to control things a bit. At least by restricting the answers they make it harder for a contestant to score an "easy" pointless by parroting some absurdly esoteric name that they just happen to have boned up on from a "pub quiz help" website (of which there are many out there).
I've been reluctant to post this theory because I suspect a lot of you may be of the "fair play to the winners however they do it" camp. I'd be interested to hear the thoughts of a contestant though - KerryisElphie, if you're reading, what were your feelings about the lady with the binder full of lists? Did you think it was a bit unfair on the rest of you - or maybe you didn't mind so much as she wasn't going to be on your show...?