True, however, wouldn't it make sense for them to also put the weaker processor and the relatively small amount of RAM in the E5 before the C6 to increase profit -- or in the very least, spec them the same?
I understand why these are low-powered (but will still run decently well), but I don't understand the decision to gimp a device that has known issues with RAM in it's current state.
In any case, I should reserve judgment until I have read some solid reviews, though. Perhaps they have further refined the OS to run better on 128MB.