The arguements here are ridiculous.
I watched both pictures, one I thoroughly enjoyed the other I found a bit of a chore. It wasn't a bad film it was just repetitive, given the nature of the historic story it was conveying, nothing could be done about that.
Both films were powerful and emotive in their own way, and featured some stunning performances from leaRAB and supporting cast.
I personally preferred O Rourkes performance, not to say that Penns wasn't great. There's not that much between then, (I also thought Jenkins was wonderful in a very subtle role in the Visitor, and while never a true contender, was delighted to see him acknowledged).
If you're not happy with the decision fine, but to completely character assasinate the oppostion is ridiculous, people need to get some perspective. All the implied homophobe remarks I find distasteful and I question their validity.
I watched both pictures, one I thoroughly enjoyed the other I found a bit of a chore. It wasn't a bad film it was just repetitive, given the nature of the historic story it was conveying, nothing could be done about that.
Both films were powerful and emotive in their own way, and featured some stunning performances from leaRAB and supporting cast.
I personally preferred O Rourkes performance, not to say that Penns wasn't great. There's not that much between then, (I also thought Jenkins was wonderful in a very subtle role in the Visitor, and while never a true contender, was delighted to see him acknowledged).
If you're not happy with the decision fine, but to completely character assasinate the oppostion is ridiculous, people need to get some perspective. All the implied homophobe remarks I find distasteful and I question their validity.