Larry Silverstein confronted again - still no response to WTC 7 lies

and this guy wasn't even confronted. the reporter just spit out a whole bunch of backstory. he said he asked a question but he really just told a story and wanted to know how the guy felt about it. why not just ask a simple question?
 
You're assuming they would not. When people are making repairs, especially to a high occupancy structure like that may repairs call for permit pulls or inspections. The people working these repairs have seen a lot in their day. I think they would be able to notice something. I mean the only way you would be able to hide it is within the concrete. Any other way and you risk it being seen. And we are talking a large amount of explosives needed. You can't just hide that with boxes and expect people to not question it.
 
If nothing else I don't find it hard to beleive that stein fellow tried to cover up the fact that it was a controlled demolition because he knew he could get more insurance money if it was collatoral damage with WT1 and WT2.
 
you always have kooks.
8th grade history teacher had his pop who served in 'nam come in to talk about the war and field questions.
dude thinks we were after the oil in the gulf of tomkin.
 
Also some of these "truthers" may push it hard, and go over the top. But who's there left to question it.. If no one dedicates all their resources in finding out the truth, than it inspires no one else to do the same. I respect them for at least trying to do something, most of the people on here who are going to call them out are the exact same ones who never have wanted to learn the truth for themselves. The same ones who are happy with their content lifestyle, and never care to know what really goes on.

They are the people the government and corporations want them to be. You can't change someone's mind or inspire them to be educated and intelligent about certain things; you can only hope they will do it for themselves. Sadly, most never will.
 
i would say you have a point here, but i dont think larry is in the building demo business so who knows what kind of terms he would use, or he uses that when ever.

and dont act so foolish that when someones says pull it, that it means to do a certain action that would get rid of something.

i love you joe cool, ur smart but get serious with that shit. you can argue better than that. even tho the idea is very foolish that it was an inside job. im just saying who knows what kind of term the guy uses, we dont know him personally.
 
i dont buy it. wiki leaks is a good example of how many whistle blowers exist and how many are willing to come forward when given an outlet. To say that an attack of this magnitude was orchestrated by our internal government is simply absurd. It has been said before that we were warned of the possible threat from such attack and yet we did nothing. Lets face it, our government screwed up by not listening (or choosing not to listen) and allowing such tragedy to occur but i find it hard to believe they were physically involved.

If what truthers are preaching is in fact true, then there has to exist some indisputable evidence of this. I am not talking about interviews with "shell-shocked" victims and firefighters or hypothesis and conjecture. Take away your personal bias and stop looking for evidence that supports your theory and instead look at all the evidence objectively. What the hell was the jackass in TS vid trying to accomplish, other then make truthers look crazy (as if they needed help to accomplish that) did he really think that the guy he is accusing would just break down in front of him and hundreRAB of cameras and say "oh you caught me!" This very idiocy is what makes truther theories so hard to believe (well and the fact that they are full of shit)

If you look for something expecting a certain outcome, then chances are you will find bits that can be shaped or misinterpreted to fit your personal "box of beliefs" A good example would be someone thats "hunting for ghosts" in an empty house, hears an eirrie noise and instantly attributes it to the "ghost" when that same noise can be a million other things when looked at objectively.
 
no you can't. This isn't the movies. explosive charges are difficult to set correctly and they require extensive wiring and rigging to fire effectively


all those guys are going to keep their mouth shut? Sure whatever. That and the fact that you're not going to keep several tons of explosives, gaping holes in the walls near every supporting beam, cutting of those beams to weaken the structure, and the thousanRAB of feet of det cord and wiring required to demo a built of that size effectively. Sorry not even possible.


one gigantic borab wouldn't bring down a building of that size, we know that from the first WTC borabing in 1993, and sorry but as stated before it's would be impossible to conceal the setting of a demolition operation.

actually I do. The most commonly used explosive C4 is actually RDX mixed with a binding agent so it's easier to shape, however the essential properties remain the same. PETN is another commonly used military explosive but it is somewhat sensitive to shock, so it's often mixed with other explosives such as RDX to form substances such as Semtex. It's also used as a booster. Both of those would have burned up long before they would have been able to trigger a controlled detonation. Also everything I mentioned here would require pre compression or some other form of booster to create the conditions for explosive. Contrary to the movies you can't just place a blob of plastic explosive on an I beam and knock a building down with a remote control. Doesn't work like that. Most of the current military conventional explosive arsenal is based around variations or corabinations of those two explosives including our artillery, missiles, and infantry deployed weapons like mines and grenades.



idiots like you usually do, but I don't have to do research on things I already know more about than you.
 
Because videos provide visualization and demonstration. Many videos are educational and it is easier than typing 12 paragraphs and then having someone else read it.
 
Back
Top