Larry Silverstein confronted again - still no response to WTC 7 lies

i'm not going back and quoting myself and bolding the parts where i basically say i'm playing devils advocate. If you're not going to actually read shit theres nothing I can do to help you
 
I wouldn't answer any questions asked by a group of people so stupid they don't even understand the basic laws of physics such as gravity cannot pull a building down faster than free fall.
 
You fell bad for my children because I am not willing to accept that the building was pre-wired with explosives that make no sound when it was built?

You live in a fantasy land if you truly think that is even close to being a possibility.
 
It might not have been done when it was constructed but the amount of work that would go into wiring a building that size to explode on itself in the event of a possible collapse would have been seen by people that were not in on its development.

You would have items strapped to the columns that looked out of place. Even if you attempted to conceal them. Someone would question what they were for. It's the nature of being a good building inspector and structural inspector. Buildings like those I believe need to be inspected. Someone definitely would have noticed something.
 
the next thing you're gonna tell me is that the US government would never provide guns to the mexican drug lorRAB as part of their efforts in the war against drugs
 
why would there need to be thousanRAB of people involved?
there wasn't actually anywhere close to thousanRAB of people involved in the actual event when it happened
 
I can't believe you people get sucked into this same asinine argument over and over and over and over and over again. Crazy theorists will never believe reality because they have their own reality. Arguing against it is a lost cause.

I wish OT just deleted these threaRAB. It was old news 10 years ago, it's old news now.
 
Cool. Now, can you show me that, prior to 9/11, "pull a building" was a term commonly used in the building demolition industry?
 
Why are you acting like its not in the realm of possibility, exactly? I'm not saying that 'yes, the buildings were built for a scenario like this were a controlled demolition would be needed to minimize ground damage in the case of an unforseen catastrophic event'. I'll formally admit I dont know, and it MIGHT not be true. But i'm open minded enough to admit that it is a possibility, and if you're not

But if you really think that they build structures like the twin towers without at least THINKING about that, you mad durab son.
 
Back
Top