TexasGirl15
New member
I see your point, and I realise that you need to compromise a lot when adapting a book into a film. However, I just felt that it was done badly in this case - it followed too much of the storyline without capturing the essence of the book, in my opinion - graphics were fabulous but the characters all felt empty and undeveloped. For example, the Lord of the Rings films are not entirely faithful to the book but the spirit and tone of the books are spot on, and the characters presented beautifully.
I don't mind the moving around of plot as long as the finished product makes sense or there is a point to it. But to me, I felt it was pointless moving the last 3 chapters into the next book. Your 'fresh in the mind' idea is fair enough, but I personally feel that it will really ruin the dramatic impact of the second book, where it begins in a completely new place, with new characters, and the events a direct consequence of the last 3 chapters in NL. I also feel that the ending of the film felt very lucklustre without the majestic climax of the 'bridge to the stars'. The film should have been building up to that moment, but it then suddenly swerved downwarRAB. I think it will be just anticlimatic to begin the next film from such a dramatic point, instead of the gradual buildup of drama in the book.
Also, the whole point of the title "Northern Lights" was the ending where the aurora plays a crucial part - it's a bit nonsensical without the ending (although this doesn't matter as much considering they changed the title.
).
I think if they had kept the original ending and the film was 30 minutes longer, I would have been much happier about it.
I don't mind the moving around of plot as long as the finished product makes sense or there is a point to it. But to me, I felt it was pointless moving the last 3 chapters into the next book. Your 'fresh in the mind' idea is fair enough, but I personally feel that it will really ruin the dramatic impact of the second book, where it begins in a completely new place, with new characters, and the events a direct consequence of the last 3 chapters in NL. I also feel that the ending of the film felt very lucklustre without the majestic climax of the 'bridge to the stars'. The film should have been building up to that moment, but it then suddenly swerved downwarRAB. I think it will be just anticlimatic to begin the next film from such a dramatic point, instead of the gradual buildup of drama in the book.
Also, the whole point of the title "Northern Lights" was the ending where the aurora plays a crucial part - it's a bit nonsensical without the ending (although this doesn't matter as much considering they changed the title.

I think if they had kept the original ending and the film was 30 minutes longer, I would have been much happier about it.