Is there a shooting you disagree with?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Surefire
  • Start date Start date
Manslaughter that results from negligence might be a homeowner that doesn't lock the gate to their pool, so a neighborhood kid jumps in it and drowns. I'm not sure, but I believe the homeowner can be charged with manslaughter (at the very least, they can be liable for damages; that much I know for sure, but I'm not sure if they can be held criminally liable), but in general, manslaughter is the result of intent, as in the case of lighting a bag of shit on someone's door step that results in a burnt down house and kills the woman inside.
 
if that is the only alternative that you can think of, then you really shouldn't be having discussions about history with anyone.
 
And yes, I am schooling you guys. It's pretty fucking obvious to all three of us that I'm the only one here that actually knows what the fuck he's talking about.
 
hogwash. law enforcement does not lie, i idealize those with high authority who i identify with
 
i disagree with the shooters that killed JFK and jack ruby who killed oswald before he could give clues on who else was involved
 
Manslaughter is when you kill a person unlawfully WITHOUT INTENT TO KILL. If there is INTENT, then you are charged with murder.
 
MLK

To prevent his next speech in which he would have pushed the envelope/agenda beyond civil rights into global politics. CIA: close the envelope.
 
That would be intentional as well. Negligence is the absence of taking action that is expected of a reasonable person (conf. failing to put up a caution sign).


How would that be negligent? The word you're looking for might be "reckless." Negligence has a very specific meaning, and I'm not convinced that you guys are actually up to speed on that meaning.
 
plenty of occasions in all major conflicts of unjustified shootings, shit happens

cops (especially in the US) seem to start shooting rather easily
 
Agreed. And severe punishment should be handed down where negligence is found. But to say it happens frequently is absurd.
 
"INTENT TO KILL" and "INTENT" are (rather, can be and often are) two different things, Joe.
 
You said the exact definition almost, yet you don't seem to comprehend it.

Main Entry: neg
 
Apparently failing to take reasonable care to check an address = intent, not negligence.
 
When deciding what kind of homicide you committed, the only intent that matters is intent to kill.
 
Back
Top