Is "disbelief in a god" an adequate definition of Western culture atheism?

What's your reasoning? If it's an adequate definition, why don't atheists just leave it at that? Why is there a substitute for Creationism (evolution), a substitute for God (Darwin) and a substitute for the Messiah (Dawkins) in Western culture atheism?
 
Evolution isn't a sbstitute for creation.

Evolution is science - creation is not.
Darwin was a scientist - a religious scientist - no one worships him.
Dawkins a messiah? Ha.
 
Back
Top