Comrade Otto
New member
Considering there is no actual proof either way that it is being sped up by man or not (although the majority of climatologists (the only scientists who opinion should really count in the debate) say it is because of man) what is the better scenario?
Doing nothing and then it turning out to be real
or
Acting now and getting off fossil fuels which in turn improves air quality and health and causes energy prices to remain stable because coal and oil arent going to be cheap forever.
So which is it?
I dont support carbon trading at all just to let you know. Carbon trading benefits business over people. The scientific majority still says climate change is being sped up by man
Doing nothing and then it turning out to be real
or
Acting now and getting off fossil fuels which in turn improves air quality and health and causes energy prices to remain stable because coal and oil arent going to be cheap forever.
So which is it?
I dont support carbon trading at all just to let you know. Carbon trading benefits business over people. The scientific majority still says climate change is being sped up by man