...using their choice of words? When was the last time you saw the current debate described as being about health INSURANCE, which it is, and not "health care", which it is most assuredly NOT?
He who frames the verbiage controls the debate.
dave: I have read it and then re-read it. Your "answer" still makes no sense.
sad: Are you seriously equating talk radio, which makes no claim to journalistic ethics as it is not peopled by journalists but rather by pundits and common people, to the mainstream media? Good lord, pull your head out of that orifice.
shan: You are simply delusional if you believe the media is not biased towards the left. Hell, even the Washington Post's own ombudsman acknowledged a bias existed during last year's campaign. Over 75% of active journalists in the United States are self-professed liberals.
He who frames the verbiage controls the debate.
dave: I have read it and then re-read it. Your "answer" still makes no sense.
sad: Are you seriously equating talk radio, which makes no claim to journalistic ethics as it is not peopled by journalists but rather by pundits and common people, to the mainstream media? Good lord, pull your head out of that orifice.
shan: You are simply delusional if you believe the media is not biased towards the left. Hell, even the Washington Post's own ombudsman acknowledged a bias existed during last year's campaign. Over 75% of active journalists in the United States are self-professed liberals.