It's pretty subjective, isn't it? Marriage law is part of common law tradition. It's meant to evolve as society evolves. The original marriage laws were written by judges, and judges are allowed to interpret it.
What bull. There are other ways to show compassion, without imposing religious beliefs.
It's sad that groups have to go to court, because the government won't allow for equal protection of minorities.
Unprotected sex is a high risk lifestyle, gay or straight, black or white.
The largest infected segment is those who have unprotected sex. This CDC link also shows that African Americans have larger infection rates in relation to their numbers. It also shows that there is a link to low income and HIV risk....
http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/pubs/Facts/afam.htm
Big, big yawn. Seriously, I knew I should have bet money that you would bring up the tired faulty analogy of smoking. Then it should also advocate against the unhealthy lifestyle of being black, the unhealty lifestyle of having a lower income, but most of all it should advocate against the unhealthy lifestyle of having unprotected sex. Being gay, in itself, is not an unhealthy lifestyle, like some of the other things I mentioned. There is no way to safely smoke.
Right, if a minority group only would know it's place, and not challenge inequality and oppression, it would be so much easier for the government to practice inequality and oppress.
Nonsense. How so? The disease thing? Why aren't you arguing that heterosexual couples who have, had, or may get, diseases, should not have the right to marry?